Interactive segregation

From Segregation Wiki
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]

2001
Israel

Definition[edit | edit source]

Interactive segregation refers to the act of voluntarily or involuntarily separating different groups of people into separate physical or social spaces. This can occur along various dimensions, such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, religion, or gender.

Interactive segregation can manifest in different ways, such as:

1. Residential segregation: This occurs when individuals of certain groups predominantly live in specific neighborhoods or areas. This can lead to the concentration of certain ethnic or socioeconomic groups in particular parts of a city, resulting in limited interaction and potential isolation from other groups.

2. School segregation: This occurs when students from different racial or socioeconomic backgrounds attend different schools. This can be a result of factors like residential segregation, school district zoning, or school choice policies. School segregation can impact educational opportunities and perpetuate disparities between different groups.

3. Social segregation: This refers to the self-imposed separation of individuals from different groups in everyday social interactions. For example, individuals might choose to associate primarily with people of their own race, religion, or socioeconomic background, leading to limited cross-cultural interactions and reinforcing social divisions.

4. Online segregation: With the rise of social media and online communities, interactive segregation can also occur in virtual spaces. People may intentionally or unintentionally segregate themselves into online echo chambers, surrounding themselves with individuals who share similar beliefs or perspectives.

Interactive segregation can have significant consequences for society, including the perpetuation of inequalities, limited exposure to diverse cultures and perspectives, and the reinforcement of stereotypes and biases. Addressing interactive segregation requires efforts to promote inclusivity, diversity, and equal opportunities for all individuals, both in physical and virtual spaces.

See also[edit | edit source]

Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]

Interactive segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

social segregation, sociospatial segregation, residential segregation, multidimensional segregation

This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:

References[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Interactive segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]

Schnell I., Yoav B. (2001). The sociospatial isolation of agents in everyday life spaces as an aspect of segregation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(4), 622-636. Blackwell Publishing Inc..https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00262

Schnell I., Harpaz M. (2005). A model of a heterogeneous neighborhood. GeoJournal, 64(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-005-4093-0

Goldhaber R., Schnell I. (2007). A model of multidimensional segregation in the Arab Ghetto in Tel Aviv Jaffa. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(5), 603-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00428.x