Client segregation

From Segregation Wiki
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]

2009
Australia

Definition[edit | edit source]

Client segregation refers to the practice of grouping clients or customers based on certain criteria or characteristics. This can involve separating clients into different categories or segments, such as based on their demographics, preferences, behaviors, or needs. The purpose of client segregation is to better understand and target specific groups of clients and to tailor marketing and customer service initiatives according to their unique requirements. By segmenting clients, businesses can effectively allocate resources and develop more personalized strategies to maximize customer satisfaction and loyalty.

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Client segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]

Kornrich S. (2009). Entrepreneurship as econornic detour? Client segregation by race and class and the black white earnings gap among physicians. Work and Occupations, 36(4), 400-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888409346822

PRIEM R. (202). Asset Segregation at CSDs: Protecting Investors with a Level Playing Field. European Business Law Review, 31(5), 917-946. Kluwer Law International.https://doi.org/