Urban wealth segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
Line 10: Line 10:
Factors contributing to urban wealth segregation include discriminatory housing policies, income inequality, unequal access to quality education and employment opportunities, and systemic racism. Addressing urban wealth segregation requires comprehensive strategies that address these root causes and work towards creating more equitable and inclusive cities for all residents.
Factors contributing to urban wealth segregation include discriminatory housing policies, income inequality, unequal access to quality education and employment opportunities, and systemic racism. Addressing urban wealth segregation requires comprehensive strategies that address these root causes and work towards creating more equitable and inclusive cities for all residents.
==See also==  
==See also==  
==Related segregation forms==
Urban wealth segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
[[social segregation]], [[neighborhood segregation]], [[spatial segregation]], [[residential segregation]]
[[File:urban_wealth_segregation.png|780x780px]]
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw
Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3
betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r
disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==  
==Notes==  

Revision as of 14:39, 27 September 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

2016
Canada

Definition

Urban wealth segregation refers to the phenomenon in cities where there is a clear divide between affluent and low-income neighborhoods. This segregation can manifest in various ways, such as disparities in access to quality housing, education, healthcare, and other resources.

In cities with high levels of urban wealth segregation, affluent individuals and families tend to cluster in certain neighborhoods, leading to gentrification and the displacement of lower-income residents. This can further exacerbate income inequality and social divides within the city.

Factors contributing to urban wealth segregation include discriminatory housing policies, income inequality, unequal access to quality education and employment opportunities, and systemic racism. Addressing urban wealth segregation requires comprehensive strategies that address these root causes and work towards creating more equitable and inclusive cities for all residents.

See also

Related segregation forms

Urban wealth segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

social segregation, neighborhood segregation, spatial segregation, residential segregation


For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:

year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw

Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3

betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r

disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Urban wealth segregation appears in the following literature

Walks A. (2016). Homeownership, Asset based Welfare and the Neighbourhood Segregation of Wealth. Housing Studies, 31(7), 755-784. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1132685