Spontaneous segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
Line 15: Line 15:
Spontaneous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:  
Spontaneous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:  


[[housing segregation]]
[[social segregation]], [[residential segregation]]
[[File:spontaneous_segregation.png|780x780px]]
[[File:spontaneous_segregation.png|780x780px]]


Line 21: Line 21:
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:  
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:  


clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw


year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw
Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3


betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r  
betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r  


disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz  
disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz  
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==  
==Notes==  

Revision as of 14:39, 27 September 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

2015
United Kingdom

Definition

Spontaneous segregation refers to the phenomenon where individuals or groups of people naturally separate themselves based on factors such as race, ethnicity, religion, or socioeconomic status. This can occur in various contexts, such as residential neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, or social settings.

Spontaneous segregation can arise from a variety of reasons, including personal preferences, cultural differences, historical factors, or discriminatory practices. It happens without the intervention or formal imposition of any governing authority or system.

While some people actively seek out or prefer to be with others who share similar backgrounds or experiences, spontaneous segregation can also perpetuate inequality and perpetuate social divisions. It can limit individuals' exposure to diverse perspectives and reinforce stereotypes or prejudices.

Addressing spontaneous segregation requires efforts to promote inclusivity, diversity, and equal opportunities for all individuals, as well as challenging discriminatory attitudes or practices that contribute to segregation.

See also

Related segregation forms

Spontaneous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

social segregation, residential segregation


For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:

year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw

Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3

betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r

disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Spontaneous segregation appears in the following literature

Alorić A., Sollich P., McBurney P. (2015). Spontaneous segregation of agents across double auction markets. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 676(), 79-90. Springer Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09578-3_7

Belloni M. (2016). Learning how to squat: Cooperation and conflict between refugees and natives in Rome. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29(4), 506-527. Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/few033