Dichotomous segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
Line 15: Line 15:
Dichotomous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:  
Dichotomous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:  


[[multigroup segregation]],[[hispanic segregation]],[[asian segregation]]
[[residential segregation]]
[[File:dichotomous_segregation.png|780x780px]]
[[File:dichotomous_segregation.png|780x780px]]


Line 21: Line 21:
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:  
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:  


clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw


year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw
Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3


betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r  
betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r  


disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz  
disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz  
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==  
==Notes==  

Revision as of 14:34, 27 September 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

2011
United States

Definition

Dichotomous segregation refers to a form of racial or ethnic segregation that divides a society into two distinct and separate groups based on a single binary categorization. This categorization can be based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality.

In a dichotomously segregated society, individuals are classified into one of two exclusive groups, with limited or no mobility between the groups. This segregation can manifest in various ways, including residential segregation, educational segregation, economic segregation, and social segregation.

Dichotomous segregation often leads to unequal access to resources, opportunities, and social privileges for the marginalized group. It can create barriers to upward mobility, reinforce stereotypes, and perpetuate social divisions and inequalities.

Historically, dichotomous segregation has been seen in various contexts, such as apartheid in South Africa, racial segregation in the United States during the Jim Crow era, and caste-based segregation in India. However, its effects can also be observed in contemporary societies around the world. Efforts to address dichotomous segregation often involve policies and initiatives aimed at promoting inclusivity, equal rights, and social integration.

See also

Related segregation forms

Dichotomous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

residential segregation


For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:

year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw

Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3

betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r

disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Dichotomous segregation appears in the following literature

Hao L., Fong E. (2011). Linking dichotomous segregation with multi group segregation: Weighted segregation ratios in selected U.S. metropolitan areas. Social Science Research, 40(1), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.005