Elective segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
 
(Creating page)
Line 1: Line 1:
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>======
2013<br>
2013<br>
spain
Spain
====== Definition ======
{{NoteAI}}


Elective segregation refers to the intentional separation of individuals or groups based on certain characteristics or preferences. Unlike mandatory segregation, elective segregation is a voluntary choice made by individuals or groups to separate themselves from others who are different from them. This separation can be based on various factors such as race, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, or personal preferences.
Elective segregation refers to the intentional separation of individuals or groups based on certain characteristics or preferences. Unlike mandatory segregation, elective segregation is a voluntary choice made by individuals or groups to separate themselves from others who are different from them. This separation can be based on various factors such as race, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, or personal preferences.
Line 13: Line 16:
==See also==  
==See also==  
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==
<references />
==Further reading==  
==Further reading==  


Abel M.; Bäuml K.-H.T. (2014) "The roles of delay and retroactive interference in retrieval induced forgetting", Memory and Cognition, 42(1), pp. 141-150. . DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84893594787&doi=10.3758%2fs13421-013-0347-0&partnerID=40&md5=642dd54e06d38c344e4fc17d30e8aa0a 10.3758/s13421-013-0347-0]
Andrew B.; Watt D.C.; Gillespie C.; Chapel H. (1987) "A study of genetic linkage in schizophrenia", Psychological Medicine, 17(2), pp. 363-370. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700024910 10.1017/S0033291700024910]


Andrew B.; Watt D.C.; Gillespie C.; Chapel H. (1987) "A study of genetic linkage in schizophrenia", Psychological Medicine, 17(2), pp. 363-370. . DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0023275998&doi=10.1017%2fS0033291700024910&partnerID=40&md5=30b09f4b97527a77b15c3b66fa4772a4 10.1017/S0033291700024910]
Purkait B. (2006) "Grain size distribution patterns of a point bar system in the Usri River, India", Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31(6), pp. 682-702. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1290 10.1002/esp.1290]


Done E.J.; Andrews M.J. (2020) "How inclusion became exclusion: policy, teachers and inclusive education", Journal of Education Policy, 35(4), pp. 447-464. Routledge. DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85063155475&doi=10.1080%2f02680939.2018.1552763&partnerID=40&md5=8a1fdd262cd49b59018ce5d170a8428b 10.1080/02680939.2018.1552763]
Fuentes F.J.M.; Andreotti A.; Le Galès P. (2013) "Controlling the Urban Fabric: The Complex Game of Distance and Proximity in European Upper Middle Class Residential Strategies", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), pp. 576-597. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01177.x 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01177.x]


Fuentes F.J.M.; Andreotti A.; Le Galès P. (2013) "Controlling the Urban Fabric: The Complex Game of Distance and Proximity in European Upper Middle Class Residential Strategies", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), pp. 576-597. . DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84874376604&doi=10.1111%2fj.1468-2427.2012.01177.x&partnerID=40&md5=5a5a0c0e1f850b757b501df71ae41793 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01177.x]
Abel M.; Bäuml K.-H.T. (2014) "The roles of delay and retroactive interference in retrieval induced forgetting", Memory and Cognition, 42(1), pp. 141-150. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0347-0 10.3758/s13421-013-0347-0]


Purkait B. (2006) "Grain size distribution patterns of a point bar system in the Usri River, India", Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31(6), pp. 682-702. . DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33744465222&doi=10.1002%2fesp.1290&partnerID=40&md5=74d3804ed8fef05cf3e9084b2e4525e9 10.1002/esp.1290]
Done E.J.; Andrews M.J. (2020) "How inclusion became exclusion: policy, teachers and inclusive education", Journal of Education Policy, 35(4), pp. 447-464. Routledge. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1552763 10.1080/02680939.2018.1552763]

Revision as of 17:42, 8 April 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

2013
Spain

Definition
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Elective segregation refers to the intentional separation of individuals or groups based on certain characteristics or preferences. Unlike mandatory segregation, elective segregation is a voluntary choice made by individuals or groups to separate themselves from others who are different from them. This separation can be based on various factors such as race, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, or personal preferences.

In some cases, people may choose elective segregation to be among others who share similar backgrounds, beliefs, or lifestyles. This can be seen in communities or neighborhoods where individuals voluntarily choose to live among others who belong to the same racial or ethnic group, or who share similar religious beliefs.

Elective segregation can also occur in education, where individuals or parents may choose to enroll in schools or programs that align with their preferences. For example, some parents may choose to send their children to private schools with a specific religious affiliation or to schools that offer specialized academic programs.

While elective segregation is a personal choice, it can have social and cultural implications. It can contribute to the creation of homogeneous communities or groups, thereby limiting opportunities for diverse interactions and experiences. This can reinforce stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination among different groups.

It is important to note that elective segregation is different from forced or institutionalized segregation, which is mandated by laws or policies. Mandatory segregation, such as historical racial segregation in the United States, was legally enforced and resulted in systemic discrimination and inequality.

See also

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).

Further reading

Andrew B.; Watt D.C.; Gillespie C.; Chapel H. (1987) "A study of genetic linkage in schizophrenia", Psychological Medicine, 17(2), pp. 363-370. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700024910 10.1017/S0033291700024910]

Purkait B. (2006) "Grain size distribution patterns of a point bar system in the Usri River, India", Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31(6), pp. 682-702. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1290 10.1002/esp.1290]

Fuentes F.J.M.; Andreotti A.; Le Galès P. (2013) "Controlling the Urban Fabric: The Complex Game of Distance and Proximity in European Upper Middle Class Residential Strategies", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), pp. 576-597. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01177.x 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01177.x]

Abel M.; Bäuml K.-H.T. (2014) "The roles of delay and retroactive interference in retrieval induced forgetting", Memory and Cognition, 42(1), pp. 141-150. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0347-0 10.3758/s13421-013-0347-0]

Done E.J.; Andrews M.J. (2020) "How inclusion became exclusion: policy, teachers and inclusive education", Journal of Education Policy, 35(4), pp. 447-464. Routledge. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1552763 10.1080/02680939.2018.1552763]