Client segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
 
(Creating page)
Line 1: Line 1:
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>======
2009<br>
2009<br>
united states
united states
 
====== Definition ======
{NoteAI}
Client segregation refers to the practice of grouping clients or customers based on certain criteria or characteristics. This can involve separating clients into different categories or segments, such as based on their demographics, preferences, behaviors, or needs. The purpose of client segregation is to better understand and target specific groups of clients and to tailor marketing and customer service initiatives according to their unique requirements. By segmenting clients, businesses can effectively allocate resources and develop more personalized strategies to maximize customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Client segregation refers to the practice of grouping clients or customers based on certain criteria or characteristics. This can involve separating clients into different categories or segments, such as based on their demographics, preferences, behaviors, or needs. The purpose of client segregation is to better understand and target specific groups of clients and to tailor marketing and customer service initiatives according to their unique requirements. By segmenting clients, businesses can effectively allocate resources and develop more personalized strategies to maximize customer satisfaction and loyalty.
==See also==  
==See also==  
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==
<references />
==Further reading==  
==Further reading==  


PRIEM R. (2020) "Asset Segregation at CSDs: Protecting Investors with a Level Playing Field", European Business Law Review, 31(5), pp. 917-946. Kluwer Law International. DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85100683471&partnerID=40&md5=1edf5495dd7ee91a6e8d417419b659a5 ]
Kornrich S. (2009) "Entrepreneurship as econornic detour? Client segregation by race and class and the black white earnings gap among physicians", Work and Occupations, 36(4), pp. 400-431. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1177/0730888409346822 10.1177/0730888409346822]


Kornrich S. (2009) "Entrepreneurship as econornic detour? Client segregation by race and class and the black white earnings gap among physicians", Work and Occupations, 36(4), pp. 400-431. . DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77951527503&doi=10.1177%2f0730888409346822&partnerID=40&md5=fe7a15a82cb53baa3cb47ffa959c08e9 10.1177/0730888409346822]
PRIEM R. (2020) "Asset Segregation at CSDs: Protecting Investors with a Level Playing Field", European Business Law Review, 31(5), pp. 917-946. Kluwer Law International. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ]

Revision as of 17:03, 8 April 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

2009
united states

Definition

{NoteAI} Client segregation refers to the practice of grouping clients or customers based on certain criteria or characteristics. This can involve separating clients into different categories or segments, such as based on their demographics, preferences, behaviors, or needs. The purpose of client segregation is to better understand and target specific groups of clients and to tailor marketing and customer service initiatives according to their unique requirements. By segmenting clients, businesses can effectively allocate resources and develop more personalized strategies to maximize customer satisfaction and loyalty.

See also

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).

Further reading

Kornrich S. (2009) "Entrepreneurship as econornic detour? Client segregation by race and class and the black white earnings gap among physicians", Work and Occupations, 36(4), pp. 400-431. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1177/0730888409346822 10.1177/0730888409346822]

PRIEM R. (2020) "Asset Segregation at CSDs: Protecting Investors with a Level Playing Field", European Business Law Review, 31(5), pp. 917-946. Kluwer Law International. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ]