Ability segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
[[File:ability_segregation.png|780x780px]] | [[File:ability_segregation.png|780x780px]] | ||
This visualization is based on the study [[ | This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. | ||
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: | For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: |
Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
1985
Japan
Definition[edit | edit source]
Ability segregation refers to the separation or division of individuals based on their abilities, skills, or disabilities. This can occur in various contexts, such as education, employment, housing, and social interactions.
In education, ability segregation may involve tracking, where students are sorted into different classes or schools based on their academic abilities. This can lead to unequal opportunities and limited access to resources for students in lower tracks.
In employment, ability segregation occurs when individuals with disabilities are marginalized and limited to certain jobs or industries, often due to stereotypes and discrimination. They may face barriers to equal employment opportunities and experience lower pay and job satisfaction.
In housing, ability segregation can manifest in the form of specialized institutions or group homes for people with disabilities, which separate them from the larger community. This has the potential to isolate individuals and limit their integration and inclusion.
In social interactions, ability segregation can occur when individuals with disabilities are excluded or face barriers in participating fully in community activities and events. This segregation can lead to social isolation and discrimination.
Ability segregation is often criticized as it perpetuates inequality and exclusion, hindering the social inclusion and rights of individuals with disabilities. Efforts are being made globally to promote inclusivity, accessibility, and equal opportunities for people of all abilities in various spheres of society.
Synonyms[edit | edit source]
The following terms are synonymous with ability segregation:
ability based segregation.
References and literature addressing this segregation form under these synonymous terms can be found below.
See also[edit | edit source]
Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]
Ability segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
residential segregation, social segregation, school segregation
This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Ability segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Nakamura K. (1985). The relationship between the development of the perception of causality and the visual ability of segregation in young children. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 33(4), 278-286. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.33.4_278
Kliewer C., Fitzgerald L.M. (2001). Disability, schooling, and the artifacts of colonialism. Teachers College Record, 103(3), 450-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00122
Allen R. (2007). Allocating pupils to their nearest secondary school: The consequences for social and ability stratification. Urban Studies, 44(4), 751-770. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601184737
Banks M.E. (201). 2009 division 35 presidential address: Feminist psychology and women with disabilities: An emerging alliance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01593.x
Lalvani P. (2014). The enforcement of normalcy in schools and the disablement of families: unpacking master narratives on parental denial. Disability and Society, 29(8), 1221-1233. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.923748
Muhamedrahimov R.J., Arintcina I.A., Solodunova M.Y., Anikina V.O., Vasilyeva M.J., Chernego D.I., Tsvetkova L.A., Grigorenko E.L. (2016). Structural characteristics of the institutional environment for young children. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(3), 103-112. Russsian Psychological Society.https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2016.0307
Basteck C., Mantovani M. (2018). Cognitive ability and games of school choice. Games and Economic Behavior, 109(), 156-183. Academic Press Inc..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.12.011
Dar Y., Resh N. (2018). Classroom composition and pupil achievement (1986): A study of the effect of ability based classes. Classroom Composition and Pupil Achievement (1986): A Study of the Effect of Ability-Based Classes, 1-200. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351214988
Countryman V. (2019). Private discrimination on the basis of race, sex, age, and disability. The William O. Douglas Inquiry into the State of Individual Freedom, 175-202. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274535-9
Parekh G., Brown R.S. (2019). Changing Lanes: The Relationship Between Special Education Placement and Students’ Academic Futures. Educational Policy, 33(1), 111-135. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818812772
Jindal A., Ransinchung R.N.G.D., Kumar P. (202). Behavioral study of self compacting concrete with wollastonite microfiber as part replacement of sand for pavement quality concrete (PQC). International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 9(2), 170-181. Elsevier B.V..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2019.06.002
Shandra C.L. (202). Disability Segregation in Volunteer Work. Sociological Perspectives, 63(1), 112-134. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419842133