Epidemic influenced segregation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:49, 18 July 2024

Date and country of first publication^[1]

2022
Spain; Germany

Definition

Epidemic-influenced segregation refers to the spatial separation or isolation of individuals, groups, or communities within a society due to the impact of an epidemic or pandemic. This form of segregation can manifest in various ways during a public health crisis and may result from both intentional measures and spontaneous societal responses to mitigate the spread of disease.

Key aspects of epidemic-influenced segregation include:

Quarantine and Isolation: During an epidemic, authorities may implement quarantine measures to restrict the movement of individuals who have been exposed to the infectious agent or who are infected. This can lead to the physical separation of affected individuals and communities from the rest of society to prevent further transmission of the disease.

Geographical Containment: Governments may impose geographic restrictions or lockdowns on specific areas with high infection rates to contain the spread of the epidemic. This can result in the isolation of entire neighborhoods, cities, or regions, leading to social and economic disruptions and exacerbating existing inequalities.

Social Stigma and Discrimination: Epidemics can foster fear, stigma, and discrimination against individuals or groups perceived to be associated with the disease. This can lead to social ostracism, harassment, or exclusion of affected individuals or communities, further exacerbating their marginalization and isolation.

Access to Resources and Services: Epidemic-influenced segregation can amplify disparities in access to essential resources and services, such as healthcare, food, and economic support. Vulnerable populations, including low-income communities, racial and ethnic minorities, and marginalized groups, may face barriers to accessing needed resources, exacerbating health and socioeconomic inequalities.

Digital and Technological Divide: During epidemics, reliance on digital technologies for remote work, education, and healthcare may exacerbate existing disparities in access to technology and internet connectivity. Individuals and communities without access to digital resources may experience increased social isolation and limited access to essential services and information.

Addressing epidemic-influenced segregation requires comprehensive public health strategies that prioritize equity, social cohesion, and community resilience. This includes ensuring equitable access to healthcare, resources, and support services for all populations, as well as combating stigma and discrimination through education, awareness-raising, and community engagement efforts.

SF Synonyms

None

Epidemic Influenced Segregation appears in the literature with the following segregation forms

References

Notes

↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).

At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Epidemic Influenced Segregation appears in the following literature

Manzano Gómez N.A. (2022.0). Planning for social distancing: How the legacy of historical epidemics shaped COVID 19's spread in Madrid. Urban Studies, -. SAGE Publications Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221110337

[1] Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).

[1]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>=====
 <br>
-Spain
+Spain; Germany
 ===== Definition =====
-The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on various aspects of society, including segregation. Here are a few ways in which the epidemic has influenced segregation:
+Epidemic-influenced segregation refers to the spatial separation or isolation of individuals, groups, or communities within a society due to the impact of an epidemic or pandemic. This form of segregation can manifest in various ways during a public health crisis and may result from both intentional measures and spontaneous societal responses to mitigate the spread of disease.
-. Health disparities: The pandemic has highlighted existing health disparities, particularly among marginalized communities. People in lower-income areas and certain ethnic minority groups have been disproportionately affected by the virus due to factors like limited access to healthcare, higher rates of chronic illnesses, and living in crowded conditions. This has further accentuated existing healthcare disparities, leading to a form of segregation based on socio-economic status and race.
+Key aspects of epidemic-influenced segregation include:
-. School closures: The closure of schools during the pandemic has disproportionately affected students from low-income households who may not have access to adequate technology or internet connectivity for remote learning. This has widened the education gap between different socio-economic groups, leading to increased educational segregation.
+Quarantine and Isolation: During an epidemic, authorities may implement quarantine measures to restrict the movement of individuals who have been exposed to the infectious agent or who are infected. This can lead to the physical separation of affected individuals and communities from the rest of society to prevent further transmission of the disease.
-. Remote work: The shift to remote work has allowed certain professions to continue virtually, while others, mainly those in service industries, have been heavily impacted. This division has created a kind of segregation between workers who can work from home and those who cannot, exacerbating existing inequalities.
+Geographical Containment: Governments may impose geographic restrictions or lockdowns on specific areas with high infection rates to contain the spread of the epidemic. This can result in the isolation of entire neighborhoods, cities, or regions, leading to social and economic disruptions and exacerbating existing inequalities.
-. Social distancing measures: Public health measures such as social distancing have inadvertently resulted in physical segregation. People have been advised to stay at home, avoid crowded places, and maintain distance from others, leading to the isolation or separation of individuals and communities. This has particularly affected vulnerable populations, such as the elderly in care homes or individuals with disabilities who rely on social interaction and support.
+Social Stigma and Discrimination: Epidemics can foster fear, stigma, and discrimination against individuals or groups perceived to be associated with the disease. This can lead to social ostracism, harassment, or exclusion of affected individuals or communities, further exacerbating their marginalization and isolation.
-. Travel restrictions: Travel restrictions implemented during the pandemic have limited mobility and created barriers between different regions and countries. This has contributed to the segregation of populations, both domestically and internationally, impacting tourism, cross-cultural interactions, and economic integration.
+Access to Resources and Services: Epidemic-influenced segregation can amplify disparities in access to essential resources and services, such as healthcare, food, and economic support. Vulnerable populations, including low-income communities, racial and ethnic minorities, and marginalized groups, may face barriers to accessing needed resources, exacerbating health and socioeconomic inequalities.
-While the epidemic has influenced segregation, it is important to note that its impacts are complex and multifaceted. Societal responses to the pandemic can either exacerbate or mitigate these segregating effects, highlighting the need for equitable strategies and policies in addressing the crisis.
+Digital and Technological Divide: During epidemics, reliance on digital technologies for remote work, education, and healthcare may exacerbate existing disparities in access to technology and internet connectivity. Individuals and communities without access to digital resources may experience increased social isolation and limited access to essential services and information.
+Addressing epidemic-influenced segregation requires comprehensive public health strategies that prioritize equity, social cohesion, and community resilience. This includes ensuring equitable access to healthcare, resources, and support services for all populations, as well as combating stigma and discrimination through education, awareness-raising, and community engagement efforts.
+===== SF Synonyms =====
+None
 ==See also==
+==Epidemic Influenced Segregation appears in the literature with the following segregation forms==
 ==References==
 ==Notes==
 <references />
 {{NoteAI}}
-==Epidemic Influenced Segregation appears on the following literature==
+==Epidemic Influenced Segregation appears in the following literature==
-Manzano Gómez N.A. (2022). Planning for social distancing: How the legacy of historical epidemics shaped COVID 19's spread in Madrid. ''Urban Studies'', -. SAGE Publications Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221110337
+Manzano Gómez N.A. (2022.0). Planning for social distancing: How the legacy of historical epidemics shaped COVID 19's spread in Madrid. ''Urban Studies'', -. SAGE Publications Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221110337