Epidemic influenced segregation
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
2022
Spain; Germany
Definition[edit | edit source]
Epidemic-influenced segregation refers to the spatial separation or isolation of individuals, groups, or communities within a society due to the impact of an epidemic or pandemic. This form of segregation can manifest in various ways during a public health crisis and may result from both intentional measures and spontaneous societal responses to mitigate the spread of disease.
Key aspects of epidemic-influenced segregation include:
Quarantine and Isolation: During an epidemic, authorities may implement quarantine measures to restrict the movement of individuals who have been exposed to the infectious agent or who are infected. This can lead to the physical separation of affected individuals and communities from the rest of society to prevent further transmission of the disease.
Geographical Containment: Governments may impose geographic restrictions or lockdowns on specific areas with high infection rates to contain the spread of the epidemic. This can result in the isolation of entire neighborhoods, cities, or regions, leading to social and economic disruptions and exacerbating existing inequalities.
Social Stigma and Discrimination: Epidemics can foster fear, stigma, and discrimination against individuals or groups perceived to be associated with the disease. This can lead to social ostracism, harassment, or exclusion of affected individuals or communities, further exacerbating their marginalization and isolation.
Access to Resources and Services: Epidemic-influenced segregation can amplify disparities in access to essential resources and services, such as healthcare, food, and economic support. Vulnerable populations, including low-income communities, racial and ethnic minorities, and marginalized groups, may face barriers to accessing needed resources, exacerbating health and socioeconomic inequalities.
Digital and Technological Divide: During epidemics, reliance on digital technologies for remote work, education, and healthcare may exacerbate existing disparities in access to technology and internet connectivity. Individuals and communities without access to digital resources may experience increased social isolation and limited access to essential services and information.
Addressing epidemic-influenced segregation requires comprehensive public health strategies that prioritize equity, social cohesion, and community resilience. This includes ensuring equitable access to healthcare, resources, and support services for all populations, as well as combating stigma and discrimination through education, awareness-raising, and community engagement efforts.
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Epidemic influenced segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Manzano Gómez N.A. (2022). Planning for social distancing: How the legacy of historical epidemics shaped COVID 19's spread in Madrid. Urban Studies, -. SAGE Publications Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221110337