Business segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[File:business_segregation.png|780x780px]] | [[File:business_segregation.png|780x780px]] | ||
This visualization is based on the study [[ | This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. | ||
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: | For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: |
Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
1998
United States
Definition[edit | edit source]
Business segregation is the practice of separating certain business activities or operations from each other in order to reduce risks, protect assets, or comply with regulatory requirements. This can involve creating separate legal entities, business units, or operational structures to ensure that the activities are distinct and independent from each other.
There are several reasons why businesses may choose to segregate their operations, including:
1. Risk management: By separating high-risk activities from low-risk activities, businesses can limit the potential impact of a failure in one area on the rest of the organization.
2. Asset protection: Segregating business operations can help protect valuable assets from liabilities associated with other parts of the business.
3. Regulatory compliance: Some industries have strict regulations that require certain activities to be segregated to ensure transparency, accountability, and protection of stakeholders.
Overall, business segregation can help businesses operate more effectively and efficiently by ensuring that each part of the organization is managed in a way that minimizes risk and maximizes potential for growth.
See also[edit | edit source]
Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]
Business segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Business segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Krenn M.L. (1996). "Unfinished Business": Segregation and U.S. Diplomacy at the 1958 World's Fair. Diplomatic History, 20(4), 591-612. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1996.tb00288.x
Ehlers T.B., Main K. (1998). Women and the false promise of microenterprise. Gender and Society, 12(4), 424-440. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/089124398012004004
Wu R. (2003). Segregation and convergence: The Chinese dilemma for financial services sectors. China and the World Trading System: Entering the New Millennium, 283-298. Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494482.018
Krenn M.L. (202). "Unfinished Business": Segregation and U.S. Diplomacy at the 1958 World's Fair. The Impact of Race on U.S. Foreign Policy: A Reader, 265-286. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003059158-9
McKenna C.J. (2021). An invisible operational mortar. The essential role of speech acts within tri segregated moviegoing. AILA Review, 34(1), 102-121. John Benjamins Publishing Company.https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20010.mck