Spontaneous segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Spontaneous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: | Spontaneous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: | ||
[[social segregation]], [[residential segregation]] | |||
[[File:spontaneous_segregation.png|780x780px]] | [[File:spontaneous_segregation.png|780x780px]] | ||
For the complete network of | |||
This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. | |||
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/ | |||
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
2015
United Kingdom
Definition[edit | edit source]
Spontaneous segregation refers to the phenomenon where individuals or groups of people naturally separate themselves based on factors such as race, ethnicity, religion, or socioeconomic status. This can occur in various contexts, such as residential neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, or social settings.
Spontaneous segregation can arise from a variety of reasons, including personal preferences, cultural differences, historical factors, or discriminatory practices. It happens without the intervention or formal imposition of any governing authority or system.
While some people actively seek out or prefer to be with others who share similar backgrounds or experiences, spontaneous segregation can also perpetuate inequality and perpetuate social divisions. It can limit individuals' exposure to diverse perspectives and reinforce stereotypes or prejudices.
Addressing spontaneous segregation requires efforts to promote inclusivity, diversity, and equal opportunities for all individuals, as well as challenging discriminatory attitudes or practices that contribute to segregation.
See also[edit | edit source]
Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]
Spontaneous segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
social segregation, residential segregation
This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Spontaneous segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Alorić A., Sollich P., McBurney P. (2015). Spontaneous segregation of agents across double auction markets. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 676(), 79-90. Springer Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09578-3_7
Belloni M. (2016). Learning how to squat: Cooperation and conflict between refugees and natives in Rome. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29(4), 506-527. Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/few033