Political segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
Political segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:  
Political segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:  


global segregation
[[social segregation]], [[residential segregation]], [[spatial segregation]], [[territorial segregation]], [[urban segregation]]
[[File:political_segregation.png|780x780px]]
[[File:political_segregation.png|780x780px]]
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:  
 
clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3
This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]].
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw
 
betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r  
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:  
disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz  
 
* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication]
 
* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters]
 
* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality]
 
* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).]
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==  
==Notes==  

Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024

Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]

2004
Switzerland

Definition[edit | edit source]

Political segregation is the phenomenon where people with similar political beliefs or affiliations tend to live in separate social or geographical communities, leading to a division and separation of political ideologies. This can create echo chambers where individuals are predominantly exposed to ideas and opinions that reinforce their own views, limiting their exposure to different perspectives and ideas. Political segregation can contribute to political polarization and hinder constructive dialogue and compromise between different ideological groups. It is important to foster an environment where individuals with diverse political beliefs can engage in respectful and open discussions to promote understanding and find common ground.

See also[edit | edit source]

Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]

Political segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

social segregation, residential segregation, spatial segregation, territorial segregation, urban segregation

This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:

References[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Political segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]

Kaufmann V. (2004). Social and political segregation of urban transportation: The merits and limitations of the Swiss cities model. Built Environment, 30(2), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.2.146.54308

Pottie D. (2004). Local government and housing in South Africa: Managing demand and enabling markets. Development in Practice, 14(5), 606-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452042000239760

Klinkner P.A., Hapanowicz A. (2005). Red and blue déjà Vu: Measuring political polarization in the 2004 election. Forum, 3(2), -. Walter de Gruyter GmbH.https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1079

King R.S. (2006). Jim crow is alive and well in the 21st century: Felony disenfranchisement and the continuing struggle to silence the african american voice. Souls, 8(2), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999940600680507

Agathangelou A.M. (2009). Necro (neo) colonizations and economies of blackness: Of slaughters, “accidents, " “disasters” and captive flesh. International Relations and States of Exception: Margins, Peripheries, and Excluded Bodies, 186-206. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203868683-13

Selle P.E.R., Strømsnes K. (201). Sámi citizenship: Marginalisation or integration?. Acta Borealia, 27(1), 66-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2010.486926

Miescher G. (2012). Facing barbarians: A narrative of spatial segregation in colonial Namibia. Journal of Southern African Studies, 38(4), 769-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2012.730842

Foster J. (2012). The wilds and the township: Articulating modernity, capital, and socio nature in the cityscape of pre apartheid Johannesburg. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 71(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2012.71.1.42

Abrams S.J., Fiorina M.P. (2012). The big sort that wasn't: A skeptical reexamination. PS - Political Science and Politics, 45(2), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000017

Lloyd C.D., Shuttleworth I. (2012). Residential segregation in Northern Ireland in 2001: Assessing the value of exploring spatial variations. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 52-67. Pion Limited.https://doi.org/10.1068/a44167

Walker K.E. (2013). Political Segregation of the Metropolis: Spatial Sorting by Partisan Voting in Metropolitan Minneapolis St Paul. City and Community, 12(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12003

Bozdag E., Gao Q., Houben G.-J., Warnier M. (2014). Does offline political segregation affect the filter bubble? An empirical analysis of information diversity for Dutch and Turkish Twitter users. Computers in Human Behavior, 41(), 405-415. Elsevier Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.028

Grewe B.-S. (2016). Space and power A material history of gold in the early 20th century; [Raum und Macht Eine Stoffgeschichte des Goldes im frühen 20. Jahrhundert]. Jahrbuch fur Wirtschaftsgeschichte, 57(1), 59-90. Akademie Verlag GMBH.https://doi.org/10.1515/jbwg-2016-0004

Mummolo J., Nall C. (2017). Why partisans do not sort: The constraints on political segregation. Journal of Politics, 79(1), 45-59. University of Chicago Press.https://doi.org/10.1086/687569

Veenstra A.S. (2018). The extremists across the aisle: selective exposure and evaluations of presidential candidate extremity. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26(4), 211-223. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2018.1494176

Mekdjian S. (2018). Urban artivism and migrations. Disrupting spatial and political segregation of migrants in European cities. Cities, 77(), 39-48. Elsevier Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.008

Li Y. (202). Melancholic nostalgia, identity crisis, and adaptation in 1950s Hong Kong: Ba Jin's Family on screen. Adaptation, 13(3), 313-333. Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/ADAPTATION/APZ029

Court B. (202). Racialising Amateurism: Punk and Rap. Third Text, 34(1), 49-61. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2019.1663686

Molendijk A.L. (202). Willem banning and the reform of socialism in the Netherlands. Contemporary European History, 29(2), 139-154. Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/S096077732000003X

Motyl M., Prims J.P., Iyer R. (202). How Ambient Cues Facilitate Political Segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(5), 723-737. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219875141

Lang L., Mell I. (202). ‘I stick to this side of the park’: Parks as shared spaces in contemporary Belfast. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 3(2), 503-526. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620918829

Rawlings C.M. (2022). Becoming an Ideologue: Social Sorting and the Microfoundations of Polarization. Sociological Science, 9(), 313-345. Society for Sociological Science.https://doi.org/10.15195/V9.A13

Trogisch L., Fletcher R. (2022). Fortress tourism: exploring dynamics of tourism, security and peace around the Virunga transboundary conservation area. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(2-3), 352-371. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1857767