Knowledge segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
[[File:knowledge_segregation.png|780x780px]]
[[File:knowledge_segregation.png|780x780px]]


This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]].


For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:  
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:  


year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw  
* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication]


Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3  
* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters]


betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r  
* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality]


disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz  
* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).]
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==  
==Notes==  

Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024

Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]

2022
Sweden

Definition[edit | edit source]

Knowledge segregation refers to the intentional or unintentional separation of information or knowledge among different individuals or groups within a society or organization. This can occur due to various factors such as social, economic, cultural, or educational disparities.

In a social context, knowledge segregation can happen when certain groups or individuals have limited access to educational resources, opportunities, or information. This can create a divide between the "haves" and the "have-nots" in terms of knowledge and information.

In an organizational context, knowledge segregation can occur when information or knowledge is not shared or disseminated effectively among different departments, teams, or individuals. This can lead to inefficiencies, duplication of efforts, and hinder organizational learning and growth.

Knowledge segregation can have significant negative consequences. It can perpetuate social inequalities, limit individual and collective potential, reinforce stereotypes and biases, and hinder innovation and progress. In contrast, knowledge integration and sharing can lead to more inclusive societies, better decision-making processes, enhanced problem-solving capabilities, and overall societal development.

Efforts to address knowledge segregation include implementing policies that promote equal access to education and information, creating platforms and spaces for knowledge sharing and collaboration, and fostering a culture of open communication and learning within organizations and communities.

See also[edit | edit source]

Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]

Knowledge segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

within-school segregation, income segregation

This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:

References[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Knowledge segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]

Dalane K., Marcotte D.E. (2022). The Segregation of Students by Income in Public Schools. Educational Researcher, 51(4), 245-254. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X221081853

Sundberg D. (2022). Curriculum Coherence: Exploring the Intended and Enacted Curriculum in Different Schools. Equity, Teaching Practice and the Curriculum: Exploring Differences in access to Knowledge, 76-89. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003218067-6