Editing Partisan segregation

===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== 
2014<br>
Italy; Denmark
===== Definition ===== 

Partisan segregation refers to the separation or division of individuals based on their political party affiliation. It is the practice of separating people into different groups or communities based on their political beliefs. This can result in a lack of interaction and understanding between individuals with different political views, leading to increased polarization and social divisions. Partisan segregation can be observed in various aspects of society, including residential areas, workplaces, and social media networks, where like-minded individuals tend to surround themselves with others who share similar political ideologies.
==See also== 
==Related segregation forms==
Partisan segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: 

[[social segregation]], [[ethnic segregation]]
[[File:partisan_segregation.png|780x780px]]

This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. 

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: 

* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] 
==References== 
==Notes== 
<references /> 
{{NoteAI}} 
==Partisan segregation appears in the following literature== 

Gnisci A., Van Dalen A., Di Conza A. (2014). Interviews in a Polarized Television Market: The Anglo American Watchdog Model Put to the Test. ''Political Communication'', ''31''(1), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.747190

Gimpel J.G., Hui I. (2017). Inadvertent and intentional partisan residential sorting. ''Annals of Regional Science'', ''58''(3), 441-468. Springer Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0802-5

Weaver I.S., Williams H., Cioroianu I., Williams M., Coan T., Banducci S. (2018). Dynamic social media affiliations among UK politicians. ''Social Networks'', ''54''(), 132-144. Elsevier B.V..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.01.008

Dubois E., Blank G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. ''Information Communication and Society'', ''21''(5), 729-745. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656

Wihbey J., Joseph K., Lazer D. (2019). The social silos of journalism? Twitter, news media and partisan segregation. ''New Media and Society'', ''21''(4), 815-835. SAGE Publications Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818807133

Brown J.R., Enos R.D. (2021). The measurement of partisan sorting for 180 million voters. ''Nature Human Behaviour'', ''5''(8), 998-1008. Nature Research.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01066-z