Partisan segregation

Date and country of first publication

2014
Italy; Denmark

Definition

Partisan segregation refers to the separation or division of individuals based on their political party affiliation. It is the practice of separating people into different groups or communities based on their political beliefs. This can result in a lack of interaction and understanding between individuals with different political views, leading to increased polarization and social divisions. Partisan segregation can be observed in various aspects of society, including residential areas, workplaces, and social media networks, where like-minded individuals tend to surround themselves with others who share similar political ideologies.

Related segregation forms

Partisan segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

social segregation, ethnic segregation

This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:

• First year of publication

• Louvain clusters

• Betweenness centrality

• Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).

Notes

At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Partisan segregation appears in the following literature

Gnisci A., Van Dalen A., Di Conza A. (2014). Interviews in a Polarized Television Market: The Anglo American Watchdog Model Put to the Test. Political Communication, 31(1), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.747190

Gimpel J.G., Hui I. (2017). Inadvertent and intentional partisan residential sorting. Annals of Regional Science, 58(3), 441-468. Springer Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0802-5

Weaver I.S., Williams H., Cioroianu I., Williams M., Coan T., Banducci S. (2018). Dynamic social media affiliations among UK politicians. Social Networks, 54(), 132-144. Elsevier B.V..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.01.008

Dubois E., Blank G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information Communication and Society, 21(5), 729-745. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656

Wihbey J., Joseph K., Lazer D. (2019). The social silos of journalism? Twitter, news media and partisan segregation. New Media and Society, 21(4), 815-835. SAGE Publications Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818807133

Brown J.R., Enos R.D. (2021). The measurement of partisan sorting for 180 million voters. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), 998-1008. Nature Research.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01066-z