Patient segregation

From Segregation Wiki
Revision as of 16:31, 23 February 2024 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Creating page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

2003
Japan

Patient segregation refers to the practice of separating patients based on certain characteristics or conditions. This can include physical separation, such as placing patients with infectious diseases in separate rooms or wards, or it can involve separating patients based on their age, gender, or specific medical needs.

The primary goal of patient segregation is to minimize the risk of spreading infections or infectious diseases in healthcare settings, as well as to ensure that patients receive appropriate care and treatment for their specific conditions. In some cases, patient segregation may also be based on cultural or religious beliefs.

Patient segregation can take place in various healthcare settings, including hospitals, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities. It is typically implemented through the use of isolation rooms, separate wards or units, or designated areas within a healthcare facility.

It is important to note that while patient segregation can be necessary in certain situations to protect the health and safety of patients and healthcare providers, it should be implemented in a way that respects the rights and dignity of all individuals involved. Efforts should be made to ensure that patients are not stigmatized or discriminated against based on their condition or characteristics.

See also

References

Further reading

Cunha V.S. (2010) "Isolated 'like us' or isolated 'among us'?: The controversy within the national academy of medicine over compulsory isolation of leprosy sufferers", Historia, Ciencias, Saude - Manguinhos, 17(4), pp. 939-953. . DOI: 10.1590/S0104-59702010000400006

Sato H.; Narita M. (2003) "Politics of leprosy segregation in Japan: The emergence, transformation and abolition of the patient segregation policy", Social Science and Medicine, 56(12), pp. 2529-2539. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00285-X