Maori occupational segregation
1987
new zealand
Maori occupational segregation refers to the pattern of Maori people being concentrated in specific industries or occupations, often characterized by lower pay, lower status, and limited opportunities for advancement. This phenomenon is a result of various historical, social, and economic factors that have contributed to the marginalization and discrimination of the Maori population in New Zealand.
One of the key factors contributing to Maori occupational segregation is the historical legacy of colonization and the subsequent loss of land and resources. This has resulted in Maori being disproportionately represented in industries such as agriculture, forestry, and fishing, which are often characterized by lower wages and limited prospects for upward mobility.
Discrimination and prejudice also play a role in Maori occupational segregation. Studies have shown that Maori job applicants are often subject to bias and stereotypes, leading to missed opportunities for employment in higher-paid and higher-status occupations. Additionally, there may be limited access to education and training opportunities for Maori, further exacerbating occupational segregation.
Another important factor is the cultural disconnect between Maori and dominant New Zealand society. Maori culture and traditions may not always be valued or catered for in mainstream workplaces, leading Maori individuals to seek employment in industries where their cultural identity is more acknowledged and affirmed.
Addressing Maori occupational segregation requires a multi-faceted approach. It is crucial to address systemic discrimination and biases through policies and practices that promote equality and diversity in the workplace. Increasing access to education and training opportunities for Maori, as well as promoting cultural awareness and understanding, can help bridge the gap and create more equitable employment opportunities.
See also
References
Further reading
Brosnan P. (1987) "Maori Occupational Segregation", Journal of Sociology, 23(1), pp. 89-103. . DOI: 10.1177/144078338702300106