Schelling sakoda segregation

From Segregation Wiki
Revision as of 14:20, 9 April 2024 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Creating page)
Date and country of first publication[1]

2020
France

Definition

Schelling-Sakoda segregation refers to a social phenomenon where individuals choose to segregate themselves from others based on their characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or socio-economic status. The term is named after economists Thomas Schelling and Junichi Sakoda, who studied this behavior in the context of residential housing patterns.

Schelling-Sakoda segregation occurs when individuals, even if they have no explicit preference for segregation, are more likely to self-segregate due to small biases and preferences in their social interactions. This can lead to the formation of homogeneous communities or neighborhoods, contributing to patterns of segregation in society.

The concept of Schelling-Sakoda segregation highlights the role of individual behaviors and preferences in creating and perpetuating segregation, and underscores the importance of addressing these underlying factors to promote diversity and integration.

See also

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Further reading

Collard P. (2020) "Second order micromotives and macrobehaviour", Journal of Computational Social Science, 3(1), pp. 209-229. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/s42001-020-00062-z