Federal correctional segregation

From Segregation Wiki
Revision as of 16:31, 23 February 2024 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Creating page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

2020
canada

Federal correctional segregation refers to the practice of isolating inmates within federal correctional facilities for various reasons. In segregation, inmates are typically confined to their cells for up to 23 hours a day, with limited human contact and restricted access to programs and services.

There are different types of federal correctional segregation, including administrative segregation, disciplinary segregation, and protective custody. Administrative segregation is used to separate inmates from the general population for reasons such as safety concerns, investigation of misconduct, or pending transfer to another facility. Disciplinary segregation is imposed as punishment for violating institutional rules or engaging in misconduct. Protective custody segregation is used to separate inmates who may be at risk of harm from other inmates.

The conditions in federal correctional segregation vary, but they generally involve confinement to a small cell, limited access to personal belongings, restricted visiting and communication privileges, and limited opportunities for recreation or programming. Inmates in segregation may also face psychological challenges due to the prolonged isolation and lack of social interaction.

The use of segregation in federal correctional facilities has been subject to scrutiny and criticism, as research has shown negative effects on mental health and potential exacerbation of behavioral issues. Efforts have been made to reduce the use of long-term segregation and to provide more humane and effective alternatives for managing difficult or high-risk inmates.

See also

References

Further reading

Prevost H.; Kilty J.M. (2020) "“You start to feel like you're losing your mind”: An intersectionality based policy analysis of federal correctional segregation policy and practice", Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 32(1), pp. 162-192. University of Toronto Press Inc.. DOI: 10.3138/CJWL.32.1.07