Minority self segregation
2009
united kingdom
Minority self-segregation refers to the phenomenon where individuals from minority groups voluntarily choose to live, socialize, and interact mainly with members of their own ethnic or racial group. This can occur in various dimensions of life, such as residential neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, social clubs, and even online communities.
There are several reasons why minority self-segregation might occur:
1. Cultural preservation: Some individuals may prefer to live among people who share similar cultural values, traditions, language, and customs. By self-segregating, they can maintain a sense of identity and protect their cultural heritage.
2. Comfort and safety: People often feel more comfortable and safe when they are surrounded by others who are similar to them, especially in environments where they may face discrimination or prejudice.
3. Social support: Minority self-segregation can provide social support networks and community resources that are specific to the needs and experiences of the minority group. This can include access to ethnic-specific services, mentorship, and role models.
4. Lack of opportunities: In some cases, minority self-segregation may be a result of limited access to resources and opportunities in mainstream society. Individuals may self-segregate as a response to inequalities and disadvantages they face in areas such as education, employment, and housing.
However, it is important to recognize that minority self-segregation can have both positive and negative consequences. On one hand, it can foster a sense of community, pride, and empowerment for minority individuals. On the other hand, it can reinforce social divisions, perpetuate stereotypes, and limit opportunities for cross-cultural understanding and collaboration.
See also
References
Further reading
Finney N.; Simpson L. (2009) "‘Sleepwalking to segregation’?: Challenging myths about race and migration", 'Sleepwalking to Segregation'?: Challenging Myths about Race and Migration, 1-218. Policy Press. DOI: [1]