Job market segregation

From Segregation Wiki
Revision as of 16:31, 23 February 2024 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Creating page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

2013
hong kong

Job market segregation refers to the phenomenon of certain groups of workers being disproportionately concentrated in specific industries or occupations, often based on factors such as race, gender, age, or disability. This segregation can limit opportunities for certain groups to access higher-paying or higher-status jobs, leading to economic and social inequality.

Some common examples of job market segregation include:

1. Gender segregation: Women are often underrepresented in industries such as technology, engineering, and construction, while being overrepresented in fields like education, healthcare, and customer service.

2. Racial segregation: People of color may face barriers to entry in certain industries or occupations, leading to higher concentrations of white workers in higher-paying jobs.

3. Age segregation: Older workers may be relegated to lower-wage, lower-skilled jobs or face discrimination in hiring processes, while younger workers are more likely to be employed in industries like technology or marketing.

4. Disability segregation: People with disabilities may face challenges in finding meaningful employment or may be limited to certain types of jobs that do not offer equal opportunities for advancement.

Addressing job market segregation requires concerted efforts to promote diversity and inclusivity in hiring practices, eliminate discrimination and bias in the workplace, and provide equal opportunities for all workers to access a wide range of occupations and industries. This can help create a more equitable and inclusive job market that benefits both individuals and society as a whole.

See also

References

Further reading

Hui E.C.M.; Yu K.H. (2013) "Commuting patterns of residents within a high density urban development: A study of Hong Kong", Habitat International, 39(), pp. 201-213. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.12.008