Voluntary self segregation

Date and country of first publication

2006
Canada

Definition

At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Voluntary self-segregation refers to individuals or groups consciously choosing to separate themselves from others based on their own preferences, beliefs, or identities. It is a phenomenon commonly observed in various social contexts, such as residential neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, and social gatherings.

In some cases, voluntary self-segregation may occur due to cultural, religious, or ethnic differences. People may feel more comfortable being surrounded by others who share similar backgrounds, values, or experiences. This can provide a sense of belonging, solidarity, and familiarity.

Voluntary self-segregation can also happen based on socioeconomic factors. People may opt to live, work, or socialize with others of similar economic or educational backgrounds to connect and collaborate with individuals who might have similar opportunities, goals, or interests.

Another dimension of self-segregation revolves around political or ideological beliefs. People may voluntarily segregate themselves from those with opposing political views or affiliations as a way to avoid conflict or maintain a sense of unity within their preferred groups.

While voluntary self-segregation is a personal choice, it can have both positive and negative consequences. On one hand, it can foster a sense of community, support, and belonging among individuals of similar backgrounds or interests. On the other hand, it may contribute to social fragmentation, reinforce stereotypes, limit diversity of perspectives, and lead to further polarization in society.

It is essential to strike a balance between voluntary self-segregation and fostering inclusive communities that respect and celebrate diversity. Encouraging open dialogue, promoting understanding, and creating spaces that accommodate different perspectives can help bridge gaps and promote social integration.

Further reading

Teixeira C. (2006) "A comparative study of Portuguese homebuyers' suburbanization in the Toronto and Montreal areas", Espace-Populations-Societes, 121-135. Universite des Sciences et Technologiques de Lille. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.4000/eps.1025 10.4000/eps.1025]

Bruner D.Y. (2008) "Aspiring and practicing leaders addressing issues of diversity and social justice", Race Ethnicity and Education, 11(4), pp. 483-500. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/13613320802479059 10.1080/13613320802479059]

Wilson T.S. (2010) "Civic Fragmentation Or Voluntary Association? Habermas, Fraser, And Charter School Segregation", Educational Theory, 60(6), pp. 643-664. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2010.00382.x 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2010.00382.x]

Stern S. (2021) ""Separate, therefore equal": American spatial segregation from Jim Crow to Kiryas Joel", RSF, 7(1), pp. 67-90. Russell Sage Foundation. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2021.7.1.05 10.7758/RSF.2021.7.1.05]