Vertical labor segregation

Date and country of first publication

2013
Germany

Definition

Vertical labor segregation refers to the phenomenon in which certain groups of people are concentrated in lower-paying or lower-status jobs within a particular industry or occupation, while other groups are more likely to be found in higher-paying or higher-status positions. This can be based on factors such as race, gender, age, disability, or other characteristics.

For example, women are often found to be overrepresented in lower-paying and lower-status positions within male-dominated industries such as technology or finance. This can result in a lack of diversity and representation in higher-level roles, as well as disparities in pay and opportunities for advancement.

Vertical labor segregation can perpetuate inequalities and create barriers for certain groups to access higher-paying and higher-status positions. Addressing this issue requires a focus on diversity and inclusion, as well as policies and practices that promote equal access to opportunities and advancement within the workforce.

SF Synonyms

vertical labour segregation

Notes

At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Vertical Labor Segregation appears in the following literature

Hofäcker D., Stoilova R., Riebling J.R. (2013.0). The gendered division of paid and unpaid work in different institutional regimes: Comparing West Germany, East Germany and Bulgaria. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr055