Black economic segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | |||
2014<br> | 2014<br> | ||
united states | united states | ||
====== Definition ====== | |||
{NoteAI} | |||
Black economic segregation refers to the systematic separation of individuals or communities based on race in terms of their access to economic opportunities and resources. This form of segregation is rooted in historical and ongoing racial discrimination, including practices such as redlining, which limited black individuals and communities from obtaining mortgages and loans, and discriminatory hiring practices that restricted access to well-paying jobs. | Black economic segregation refers to the systematic separation of individuals or communities based on race in terms of their access to economic opportunities and resources. This form of segregation is rooted in historical and ongoing racial discrimination, including practices such as redlining, which limited black individuals and communities from obtaining mortgages and loans, and discriminatory hiring practices that restricted access to well-paying jobs. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | |||
<references /> | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
Kucheva Y.; Sander R. (2014) "The misunderstood consequences of Shelley v. Kraemer", Social Science Research, 48(), pp. 212-233. Academic Press Inc.. DOI: [ | Kucheva Y.; Sander R. (2014) "The misunderstood consequences of Shelley v. Kraemer", Social Science Research, 48(), pp. 212-233. Academic Press Inc.. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.007 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.007] | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 8 April 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
2014
united states
Definition
{NoteAI} Black economic segregation refers to the systematic separation of individuals or communities based on race in terms of their access to economic opportunities and resources. This form of segregation is rooted in historical and ongoing racial discrimination, including practices such as redlining, which limited black individuals and communities from obtaining mortgages and loans, and discriminatory hiring practices that restricted access to well-paying jobs.
The consequences of black economic segregation are far-reaching. It creates disparities in income, wealth, and overall economic well-being between black and white individuals or communities. Black individuals often face limited access to quality education, healthcare, and other essential services, leading to further economic disadvantages.
Black economic segregation is closely intertwined with residential segregation, as racial discrimination in housing has led to concentrated poverty and limited opportunities for upward mobility in predominantly black neighborhoods. These segregated neighborhoods often lack access to good schools, job opportunities, healthcare facilities, and grocery stores, creating a cycle of poverty and limited economic mobility.
Efforts to address black economic segregation involve policies that focus on promoting racial equity, combating systemic racism, and breaking down barriers to economic opportunities. This includes investments in affordable housing, improvements in education systems, targeted job training programs, and policies that promote inclusive economic development. Additionally, addressing racial disparities in access to capital and entrepreneurship opportunities is crucial for reducing black economic segregation.
Promoting economic integration and creating opportunities for all individuals and communities, regardless of their race, is essential for achieving economic equality and justice.
See also
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
Further reading
Kucheva Y.; Sander R. (2014) "The misunderstood consequences of Shelley v. Kraemer", Social Science Research, 48(), pp. 212-233. Academic Press Inc.. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.007 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.007]