Enforced gender segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
Line 20: Line 20:
[[File:enforced_gender_segregation.png|780x780px]]
[[File:enforced_gender_segregation.png|780x780px]]


Visualization based on the [[How_to_cite_Segregation_Wiki| research]]


For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:  
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:  


year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw  
* First year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw  


Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3  
* Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3  


betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r  
* Betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r  


disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz  
* Disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz  
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==  
==Notes==  

Revision as of 13:40, 3 October 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

2012
Saudi Arabia

Definition

Enforced gender segregation refers to a policy or system that mandates the separation of individuals based on their gender, typically in public spaces, institutions, or social activities. This practice has historically been justified on various grounds, including cultural, religious, or societal norms.

For instance, certain countries or regions have implemented enforced gender segregation in educational institutions, public transportation, workplaces, religious spaces, sports facilities, or public events. In such cases, men and women are strictly separated and have limited or no interaction with each other.

Advocates of enforced gender segregation argue that it helps maintain traditional values, protects individuals' modesty, and prevents immoral behavior. They may also argue that it ensures proper gender roles and prevents sexual harassment or assault. Some religious or cultural beliefs also support enforced gender segregation as a way to uphold religious teachings or societal norms.

However, opponents of enforced gender segregation argue that it perpetuates gender inequality, restricts individual freedoms, and reinforces harmful stereotypes. They argue that such practices restrict women's access to opportunities, limit their social participation, and inhibit their ability to fully engage in society. Critics often stress the importance of promoting gender equality and dismantling gender-based discrimination.

The debate around enforced gender segregation often sparks discussions on human rights, gender equality, individual freedoms, cultural relativism, and the role of religion in public life. Countries and societies around the world have different perspectives and policies on this matter, reflecting diverse cultural, social, and religious contexts.

See also

Related segregation forms

Enforced gender segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

social segregation

Visualization based on the research

For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Enforced gender segregation appears in the following literature

Thompson M.C. (2012). Saudi youth: Challenges for the future. Orient, 53(4), 32-38. https://doi.org/

McAdam M., Crowley C., Harrison R.T. (202). Digital girl: cyberfeminism and the emancipatory potential of digital entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 55(2), 349-362. Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00301-2