Self territorial segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Overall, self-territorial segregation reflects individuals' choices and desires to be in spaces that align with their values and preferences. However, it is important to consider how this behavior can contribute to wider patterns of inequality and exclusion in society. | Overall, self-territorial segregation reflects individuals' choices and desires to be in spaces that align with their values and preferences. However, it is important to consider how this behavior can contribute to wider patterns of inequality and exclusion in society. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==Related segregation forms== | |||
Self territorial segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: | |||
[[self segregation]] | |||
[[File:self_territorial_segregation.png|780x780px]] | |||
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see: | |||
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw | |||
Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 | |||
betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r | |||
disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Revision as of 14:38, 27 September 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
1984
Israel
Definition
Self-territorial segregation refers to the voluntary separation of individuals or groups based on their geographical location or territory. This can occur for a variety of reasons, such as cultural differences, socio-economic status, or personal preferences. People may choose to live in certain neighborhoods or regions where they feel more comfortable or where they believe they have better access to resources and opportunities.
Self-territorial segregation can have both positive and negative impacts. On the one hand, it can help individuals maintain a sense of identity and community, as well as provide a feeling of safety and belonging. On the other hand, it can also lead to social isolation, inequality, and perpetuate stereotypes and prejudices.
Overall, self-territorial segregation reflects individuals' choices and desires to be in spaces that align with their values and preferences. However, it is important to consider how this behavior can contribute to wider patterns of inequality and exclusion in society.
See also
Related segregation forms
Self territorial segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw
Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3
betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r
disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Self territorial segregation appears in the following literature
Shilhav Y. (1984). Spatial strategies of the "haredi" population in Jerusalem. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 18(6), 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(84)90050-8