Occupational linguistic segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
Line 1: Line 1:
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>======  
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>======  
2021<br>
2021<br>
United states
United States
====== Definition ======  
====== Definition ======  
{{NoteAI}}  
{{NoteAI}}  

Revision as of 17:55, 8 April 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

2021
United States

Definition
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Occupational linguistic segregation refers to the phenomenon where individuals of different linguistic backgrounds are concentrated in specific job types or occupations. This segregation can be based on various factors, including language proficiency, cultural norms, discrimination, and lack of access to opportunities.

One common example of occupational linguistic segregation is seen in industries that require fluency in a specific dominant language. For instance, in many countries, non-native speakers of the majority language may face barriers in accessing high-skilled jobs that require advanced language skills. As a result, they may be disproportionately represented in low-skilled or service-based occupations. This segregation perpetuates economic disparities and limits social and economic mobility for individuals with linguistic diversity.

Occupational linguistic segregation can also occur within specific ethnic or immigrant communities. Immigrants who have limited proficiency in the majority language may rely on networks and support systems within their own linguistic communities, leading to concentration in certain job sectors. This can create self-contained linguistic enclaves, where specific languages are largely spoken within certain occupational fields, limiting integration and mobility.

Furthermore, occupational linguistic segregation can be enforced by discriminatory practices within the labor market. Employers may have biased preferences for hiring individuals who speak a particular language or have a certain accent, thus perpetuating segregation and limiting opportunities for individuals with linguistic diversity.

Overall, occupational linguistic segregation can have negative consequences for individuals and society as a whole, such as limited upward mobility, economic inequalities, and social integration challenges. Efforts to promote language diversity and inclusivity in the labor market can help reduce occupational linguistic segregation and create more equitable opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their linguistic backgrounds.

See also

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).

Further reading

Morales M.C. (2021) "Linguistic occupation segregation along the U.S. Mexico border: Using the index of dissimilarity to measure inequality in employment among monolingual speakers and Spanish English bilinguals", International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(270), pp. 95-114. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0022 10.1515/ijsl-2020-0022]