Compulsory segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | ====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | ||
1997<br> | 1997<br> | ||
South | South Africa | ||
====== Definition ====== | ====== Definition ====== | ||
{{NoteAI}} | {{NoteAI}} | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 8 April 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
1997
South Africa
Definition
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Compulsory segregation refers to a policy or practice of separating certain groups of people based on specific attributes or characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or religion, and mandating their physical separation in public spaces, institutions, or organizations. This form of segregation is often enforced by laws or regulations and is in contrast to voluntary segregation where individuals or groups segregate themselves willingly. Compulsory segregation has been implemented in various societies throughout history as a means of promoting social, political, or economic inequality, and has generally been criticized as discriminatory and unjust.
See also
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
Further reading
Maharaj B. (1997) "Apartheid, urban segregation, and the local state: Durban and the group areas act in south africa", Urban Geography, 18(2), pp. 135-154. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.18.2.135 10.2747/0272-3638.18.2.135]
Kenworthy J.; Whittaker J. (2000) "Anything to Declare? The Struggle for Inclusive Education and Children's Rights", Disability and Society, 15(2), pp. 219-231. Carfax Publishing Company. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/09687590025649 10.1080/09687590025649]
Obregón D. (2002) "Building national medicine: Leprosy and power in Colombia, 1870 1910", Social History of Medicine, 15(1), pp. 89-108. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1093/shm/15.1.89 10.1093/shm/15.1.89]
Seng L.K. (2008) "'Our lives are bad but our luck is good': A social history of leprosy in Singapore", Social History of Medicine, 21(2), pp. 291-309. . DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkn035 10.1093/shm/hkn035]
Loong C.W.; Fong H.S. (2013) "Oral History, Heritage Conservation, and the Leprosy Settlement: The Sungai Buloh Community in Malaysia", Palgrave Studies in Oral History, 159-175. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311672_9 10.1057/9781137311672_9]
Snelders S.; Van Bergen L.; Huisman F. (2021) "Leprosy and the colonial gaze: Comparing the dutch West and East Indies, 1750 1950", Social History of Medicine, 34(2), pp. 611-631. Oxford University Press. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkz079 10.1093/shm/hkz079]