Partisan spatial segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | |||
2015<br> | 2015<br> | ||
United states | |||
====== Definition ====== | |||
{{NoteAI}} | |||
Partisan spatial segregation refers to the phenomenon of like-minded individuals clustering together based on their political affiliations or ideologies, leading to the concentration of politically homogeneous neighborhoods or communities. | Partisan spatial segregation refers to the phenomenon of like-minded individuals clustering together based on their political affiliations or ideologies, leading to the concentration of politically homogeneous neighborhoods or communities. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | |||
<references /> | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
Weaver R.C. (2015) "The Partisan Geographies of Sincere Crossover Voting Behavior: Evidence from North Carolina", Professional Geographer, 67(2), pp. 145-153. Routledge. DOI: [ | Weaver R.C. (2015) "The Partisan Geographies of Sincere Crossover Voting Behavior: Evidence from North Carolina", Professional Geographer, 67(2), pp. 145-153. Routledge. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.866442 10.1080/00330124.2013.866442] | ||
Revision as of 17:42, 8 April 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
2015
United states
Definition
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Partisan spatial segregation refers to the phenomenon of like-minded individuals clustering together based on their political affiliations or ideologies, leading to the concentration of politically homogeneous neighborhoods or communities.
In the context of partisan spatial segregation, individuals tend to reside in areas where the majority of their neighbors share similar political beliefs, leading to politically homogeneous enclaves. This trend can be observed in both urban and rural settings.
This segregation can occur due to various factors, including self-selection, income disparities, racial or ethnic composition, media influence, and redistricting practices. For example, some individuals may actively seek out neighborhoods where they feel politically comfortable, leading to the formation of politically homogeneous communities.
Partisan spatial segregation has important implications for society as it can contribute to political polarization and reinforce echo chambers. When individuals are exposed primarily to opinions and perspectives that align with their own, it can result in limited understanding and empathy towards opposing viewpoints. This can hinder political dialogue, compromise, and the ability to address collective challenges. Additionally, partisan spatial segregation can amplify socioeconomic disparities and inequalities, as communities with similar political orientations may have differing priorities and approaches to social and economic issues.
Efforts to address partisan spatial segregation typically involve promoting diversity, inclusivity, and civic engagement. These initiatives aim to facilitate interactions and dialogue between individuals from different political backgrounds, encourage cross-partisan collaborations, and foster a greater understanding of diverse viewpoints. Policy measures such as nonpartisan redistricting and fair housing practices may also help mitigate the effects of partisan spatial segregation.
See also
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
Further reading
Weaver R.C. (2015) "The Partisan Geographies of Sincere Crossover Voting Behavior: Evidence from North Carolina", Professional Geographer, 67(2), pp. 145-153. Routledge. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.866442 10.1080/00330124.2013.866442]