Legally sanctioned segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | |||
2007<br> | 2007<br> | ||
United states | |||
====== Definition ====== | |||
{{NoteAI}} | |||
Legally sanctioned segregation refers to policies or laws that enforce the separation and/or discrimination of individuals or groups based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, or socioeconomic status. Historically, these policies were prevalent in several countries, including the United States during the era of Jim Crow Laws, South Africa during apartheid, and Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. | Legally sanctioned segregation refers to policies or laws that enforce the separation and/or discrimination of individuals or groups based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, or socioeconomic status. Historically, these policies were prevalent in several countries, including the United States during the era of Jim Crow Laws, South Africa during apartheid, and Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | |||
<references /> | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
West M.R.; Peterson P.E. (2007) "The adequacy lawsuit: A critical appraisal", School Money Trials: The Legal Pursuit of Educational Adequacy, 1-22. Brookings Institution Press. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ] | |||
Safransky S. (2018) "Land Justice as a Historical Diagnostic: Thinking with Detroit", Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(2), pp. 499-512. Taylor and Francis Ltd.. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1385380 10.1080/24694452.2017.1385380] | |||
Revision as of 17:42, 8 April 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
2007
United states
Definition
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Legally sanctioned segregation refers to policies or laws that enforce the separation and/or discrimination of individuals or groups based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, or socioeconomic status. Historically, these policies were prevalent in several countries, including the United States during the era of Jim Crow Laws, South Africa during apartheid, and Nazi Germany during the Holocaust.
During the era of legally sanctioned segregation in the United States, racial segregation was enforced in various sectors of society, such as schools, housing, transportation, and public facilities. These policies were supported and upheld by state and local laws, as well as court decisions, that justified separate facilities and services based on the false belief in racial superiority.
It is important to note that legally sanctioned segregation has been widely condemned as a violation of human rights and equality. It perpetuates systemic discrimination, marginalization, and inequality among various social groups. In the United States, significant progress has been made in dismantling legally sanctioned segregation through civil rights movements and legislation, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
While legally sanctioned segregation is no longer prevalent in many countries, various forms of discrimination and inequalities still persist. Efforts to address and eliminate these inequalities are ongoing, aiming to create a more inclusive and equitable society for all.
See also
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
Further reading
West M.R.; Peterson P.E. (2007) "The adequacy lawsuit: A critical appraisal", School Money Trials: The Legal Pursuit of Educational Adequacy, 1-22. Brookings Institution Press. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ]
Safransky S. (2018) "Land Justice as a Historical Diagnostic: Thinking with Detroit", Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(2), pp. 499-512. Taylor and Francis Ltd.. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1385380 10.1080/24694452.2017.1385380]