Land use segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
 
(Creating page)
Line 1: Line 1:
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>======
1998<br>
1998<br>
united kingdom
United kingdom
====== Definition ======
{{NoteAI}}


Land use segregation refers to the practice of separating land uses within a certain geographic area. This can involve zoning laws and regulations that restrict certain types of land uses to specific areas, such as residential, commercial, industrial, or recreational.  
Land use segregation refers to the practice of separating land uses within a certain geographic area. This can involve zoning laws and regulations that restrict certain types of land uses to specific areas, such as residential, commercial, industrial, or recreational.  
Line 11: Line 14:
==See also==  
==See also==  
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==
<references />
==Further reading==  
==Further reading==  


Filion P.; Tomalty R.; Townsend C. (2022) "CHANGES IN THE BUILT FORM OF CANADA’S SUBURBS", Plan Canada, 62(2), pp. 19-23. Canadian Institute of Planners. DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135752404&partnerID=40&md5=a5a401edb3689591c40720a972b813fb ]
Barton H. (1998) "Eco neighbourhoods: a review of projects", Local Environment, 3(2), pp. 159-177. Carfax Publishing Company. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/13549839808725555 10.1080/13549839808725555]


Romero F.S. (2022) "“For the Contrary View”: Reconsidering the Early Anti Zoning Decisions", Journal of Planning History, 21(3), pp. 199-214. SAGE Publications Inc.. DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85119529206&doi=10.1177%2f15385132211047544&partnerID=40&md5=321a061a3397ccff2baed186a8c8a534 10.1177/15385132211047544]
Moran M.; Plaut P.; Baron-Epel O. (2016) "Do children walk where they bike? Exploring built environment correlates of children’s walking and bicycling", Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(2), pp. 43-65. University of Minnesota. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.556 10.5198/jtlu.2015.556]


Hamzaoui H.; Bada Y.; Torre C.M.; Bonifazi A. (2022) "Exploring the segregation of commercial land use by gender in the city centre of Biskra, Algeria A syntactic study, the movement economy process", International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(2), pp. 131-147. SPSD Press. DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85128834317&doi=10.14246%2firspsd.10.2_131&partnerID=40&md5=8fe95d6b50c932eefc42460eac8f5ba6 10.14246/irspsd.10.2_131]
Raman R.; Roy U.K. (2019) "Taxonomy of urban mixed land use planning", Land Use Policy, 88(), pp. -. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102]


Raman R.; Roy U.K. (2019) "Taxonomy of urban mixed land use planning", Land Use Policy, 88(), pp. -. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85069960080&doi=10.1016%2fj.landusepol.2019.104102&partnerID=40&md5=d89512b616e6db138a4065b080f1dd7d 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102]
Filion P.; Tomalty R.; Townsend C. (2022) "CHANGES IN THE BUILT FORM OF CANADA’S SUBURBS", Plan Canada, 62(2), pp. 19-23. Canadian Institute of Planners. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ]


Moran M.; Plaut P.; Baron-Epel O. (2016) "Do children walk where they bike? Exploring built environment correlates of children’s walking and bicycling", Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(2), pp. 43-65. University of Minnesota. DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84980369529&doi=10.5198%2fjtlu.2015.556&partnerID=40&md5=cb01aae6f0b2f91f371b3b5912a2e197 10.5198/jtlu.2015.556]
Romero F.S. (2022) "“For the Contrary View”: Reconsidering the Early Anti Zoning Decisions", Journal of Planning History, 21(3), pp. 199-214. SAGE Publications Inc.. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1177/15385132211047544 10.1177/15385132211047544]


Barton H. (1998) "Eco neighbourhoods: a review of projects", Local Environment, 3(2), pp. 159-177. Carfax Publishing Company. DOI: [https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031760778&doi=10.1080%2f13549839808725555&partnerID=40&md5=242746510fac18ae8dd4cfe4e4bd2b95 10.1080/13549839808725555]
Hamzaoui H.; Bada Y.; Torre C.M.; Bonifazi A. (2022) "Exploring the segregation of commercial land use by gender in the city centre of Biskra, Algeria A syntactic study, the movement economy process", International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(2), pp. 131-147. SPSD Press. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.2_131 10.14246/irspsd.10.2_131]

Revision as of 17:42, 8 April 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

1998
United kingdom

Definition
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Land use segregation refers to the practice of separating land uses within a certain geographic area. This can involve zoning laws and regulations that restrict certain types of land uses to specific areas, such as residential, commercial, industrial, or recreational.

Land use segregation can have both positive and negative effects. On the positive side, it can help prevent conflicts between incompatible land uses, such as industrial facilities located near residential neighborhoods. It can also help to promote efficient land use and transportation planning.

However, land use segregation can also lead to social and economic inequalities, as certain land uses may be concentrated in specific areas that are typically associated with lower property values and less investment. This can lead to a lack of access to amenities and services for certain communities, as well as environmental injustices.

Overall, land use segregation is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of both the benefits and drawbacks in order to create more equitable and sustainable land use patterns.

See also

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).

Further reading

Barton H. (1998) "Eco neighbourhoods: a review of projects", Local Environment, 3(2), pp. 159-177. Carfax Publishing Company. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1080/13549839808725555 10.1080/13549839808725555]

Moran M.; Plaut P.; Baron-Epel O. (2016) "Do children walk where they bike? Exploring built environment correlates of children’s walking and bicycling", Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(2), pp. 43-65. University of Minnesota. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.556 10.5198/jtlu.2015.556]

Raman R.; Roy U.K. (2019) "Taxonomy of urban mixed land use planning", Land Use Policy, 88(), pp. -. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102]

Filion P.; Tomalty R.; Townsend C. (2022) "CHANGES IN THE BUILT FORM OF CANADA’S SUBURBS", Plan Canada, 62(2), pp. 19-23. Canadian Institute of Planners. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ]

Romero F.S. (2022) "“For the Contrary View”: Reconsidering the Early Anti Zoning Decisions", Journal of Planning History, 21(3), pp. 199-214. SAGE Publications Inc.. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1177/15385132211047544 10.1177/15385132211047544]

Hamzaoui H.; Bada Y.; Torre C.M.; Bonifazi A. (2022) "Exploring the segregation of commercial land use by gender in the city centre of Biskra, Algeria A syntactic study, the movement economy process", International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(2), pp. 131-147. SPSD Press. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.2_131 10.14246/irspsd.10.2_131]