Urban rural segregation

Date and country of first publication

1985
Australia

Definition

Urban rural segregation refers to the separation of urban and rural areas within a society, often resulting in distinct disparities in terms of socioeconomic, demographic, and resource distribution. This segregation can manifest in various ways, such as:

1. Residential segregation: Urban areas often have higher residential densities and more diverse housing options, whereas rural areas are characterized by lower densities and limited housing options. This can lead to physical separation and limited interaction between urban and rural populations.

2. Economic segregation: Urban areas typically provide more job opportunities, better access to education, healthcare, and other essential services, leading to higher incomes and greater economic prosperity. Rural areas, on the other hand, may face limited economic opportunities, lower incomes, and higher poverty rates.

3. Infrastructure segregation: Urban areas generally benefit from better infrastructure, including transportation systems, communication networks, and public services like water supply, sanitation, and garbage disposal. Rural areas often face inadequate infrastructure, causing challenges in accessing basic amenities.

4. Demographic segregation: Urban areas tend to have more diverse populations, with greater ethnic, racial, and cultural diversity. Rural areas often have more homogenous populations, leading to differences in cultural practices, social norms, and community cohesion.

Urban rural segregation can have significant consequences, such as unequal access to resources and opportunities, widening income and wealth gaps, and disparities in health and education outcomes. Addressing this segregation requires comprehensive policies and programs aimed at improving infrastructure, expanding economic opportunities, promoting inclusive development, and fostering social integration between urban and rural areas.

Synonyms

The following terms are synonymous with urban rural segregation:

rural urban segregation.

References and literature addressing this segregation form under these synonymous terms can be found below.

Related segregation forms

Urban rural segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

social segregation

This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:

• First year of publication

• Louvain clusters

• Betweenness centrality

• Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).

Notes

At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Urban rural segregation appears in the following literature

NG Y.‐K. (1985). Equity and Efficiency vs. Freedom and Fairness: An Inherent Conflict. Kyklos, 38(4), 495-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1985.tb01243.x

Tan K.C. (1993). Rural urban segregation in China. Geography Research Forum, 13(), 71-83. https://doi.org/

Chuanyi C., Xiaoli C. (2009). Changing the policy paradigm on chinese migrant workers: Towards balanced urban and rural development, people orientation, equal treatment and consultative management. Confronting Discrimination and Inequality in China: Chinese and Canadian Perspectives, 99-128. University of Ottawa Press.https://doi.org/

Meng X. (2012). Labor market outcomes and reforms in China. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 75-102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.75

Xue D., Huang G., Guan J., Lin J. (2014). Changing concepts of city and urban planning practices in Guangzhou (1949 2010): An approach to sustainable urban development. Chinese Geographical Science, 24(5), 607-619. Science Press.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0711-4

Chan K.W. (2018). Internal migration. Changing China: A Geographic Appraisal, 229-242. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501760

Duckett J. (202). Neoliberalism, Authoritarian Politics and Social Policy in China. Development and Change, 51(2), 523-539. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12568