Women segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
Line 18: Line 18:
References and literature addressing this segregation form under these synonymous terms can be found below.
References and literature addressing this segregation form under these synonymous terms can be found below.
==See also==  
==See also==  
==Related segregation forms==
Women segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
[[occupational segregation]], [[racial segregation]], [[gender segregation]], [[land use segregation]]
[[File:women_segregation.png|780x780px]]
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw
Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3
betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r
disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz
==References==  
==References==  
==Notes==  
==Notes==  

Revision as of 14:40, 27 September 2024

Date and country of first publication[1]

1991
Pakistan

Definition

Women segregation refers to the practice of separating women from men in various aspects of society, such as public spaces, education, workplaces, and social events. This segregation is typically based on traditional gender roles and beliefs that women and men should have separate spheres of influence and activities.

Women segregation has been practiced in many cultures and historical contexts. Examples include the seclusion of women in certain Muslim societies, the separation of women and men in some religious ceremonies, and gender-specific roles and responsibilities assigned to women in traditional societies.

In some cases, women segregation is enforced through legal and social norms. This can limit women's access to education, employment, political participation, and other opportunities. It can also perpetuate gender inequalities and reinforce gender stereotypes.

However, in recent times, there has been a growing push for gender equality and the dismantling of women segregation practices. Many countries have implemented laws and policies to promote gender integration and equal rights for women. Efforts are also being made to challenge cultural and traditional practices that enforce women segregation.

Synonyms

The following terms are synonymous with:

women's segregation.

References and literature addressing this segregation form under these synonymous terms can be found below.

See also

Related segregation forms

Women segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:

occupational segregation, racial segregation, gender segregation, land use segregation


For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see:

year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw

Louvain clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3

betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r

disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz

References

Notes

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Women segregation appears in the following literature

Duncan A. (1991). Comments on "Duality of Female Employment in Pakistan".. Pakistan Development Review, 30(4 Pt 2), 741-743. https://doi.org/

Seguino S. (1997). Gender wage inequality and export led growth in South Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 34(2), 102-132. Frank Cass Publishers.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389708422513

Cross S., Bagilhole B. (2002). Girls' jobs for the boys? Men, masculinity and non traditional occupations. Gender, Work and Organization, 9(2), 204-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00156

Escriche L. (2007). Persistence of occupational segregation: The role of the intergenerational transmission of preferences. Economic Journal, 117(520), 837-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02052.x

Tojerow H. (2008). Industry wage differentials rent sharing and gender in Belgium. Reflets et Perspectives de la Vie Economique, 47(3), 55-65. Boeck Universite.https://doi.org/10.3917/rpve.473.0055

Flamez E., Vanobbergen B. (2013). 'Since when are we, mothers who raise their kids themselves, dopes?' Debates on women's emancipation in Belgian educational television programmes for women (1954 1975). Paedagogica Historica, 49(1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2012.744065

Buchely L. (2013). Overcoming gender disadvantages. Social policy analysis of urban middle class women in Colombia; [La superación de las desventajas de género. Análisis de políticas sociales de las mujeres de la clase media urbana en Colombia]. Revista de Economia del Rosario, 16(2), 313-340. Universidad del Rosario.https://doi.org/

Kruppe T., Lang J. (2018). Labour market effects of retraining for the unemployed: the role of occupations. Applied Economics, 50(14), 1578-1600. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1368992

Tesfai R. (202). Immigrants’ occupational segregation in France: “brown collar” jobs or a Sub Saharan African disadvantage?. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(15), 2724-2745. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1686162

Hamzaoui H., Bada Y., Torre C.M., Bonifazi A. (2022). Exploring the segregation of commercial land use by gender in the city centre of Biskra, Algeria A syntactic study, the movement economy process. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(2), 131-147. SPSD Press.https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.2_131