Interfirm racial segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Overall, interfirm racial segregation is a systemic issue that perpetuates racial inequality and limits diversity and inclusion within the workplace. It is important for companies to actively work towards creating equitable and inclusive environments that promote diversity and equal opportunities for all employees, regardless of their race or ethnicity. | Overall, interfirm racial segregation is a systemic issue that perpetuates racial inequality and limits diversity and inclusion within the workplace. It is important for companies to actively work towards creating equitable and inclusive environments that promote diversity and equal opportunities for all employees, regardless of their race or ethnicity. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==Interfirm | ==Related segregation forms== | ||
Interfirm racial segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: | |||
employment segregation | employment segregation | ||
[[interfirm_racial_segregation.png|780x780px]] | |||
For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see: | |||
clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 | |||
year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw | |||
betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r | |||
disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
{{NoteAI}} | {{NoteAI}} | ||
==Interfirm | ==Interfirm racial segregation appears in the following literature== | ||
Carrington W.J., Troske K.R. (1998 | Carrington W.J., Troske K.R. (1998). Interfirm segregation and the black/white wage gap. ''Journal of Labor Economics'', ''16''(2), 231-260. University of Chicago Press.https://doi.org/10.1086/209888 | ||
Mouw T. (2002 | Mouw T. (2002). Are black workers missing the connection? the effect of spatial distance and employee referrals on interfirm racial segregation. ''Demography'', ''39''(3), 507-528. Duke University Press.https://doi.org/10.2307/3088329 |
Revision as of 16:17, 25 September 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
1998
United States
Definition
Interfirm racial segregation refers to the practice of racial segregation between different firms or companies. This means that companies may intentionally segregate their workforce based on race, leading to different racial groups being assigned to different firms or divisions within the same company.
This form of segregation can occur in several ways:
1. Recruitment and hiring: Companies may have biased hiring practices that favor one racial group over another. This can result in certain firms having a predominantly white workforce, while others have a predominantly non-white workforce.
2. Promotion and advancement: Discrimination in promotion and advancement opportunities can contribute to racial segregation between firms. If certain racial groups consistently face barriers to advancement within a company, they may be overrepresented in lower-level positions at certain firms.
3. Segregated workspaces: Some companies may physically separate employees based on race, either through assigning different racial groups to different departments or segregating them within the same workplace. This can lead to limited interaction and communication between different racial groups.
4. Discriminatory policies and practices: Companies may have policies or practices that disproportionately affect certain racial groups, leading to racial segregation between firms. For example, if a company implements a dress code policy that disproportionately affects employees of certain racial backgrounds, those employees may be more likely to seek employment elsewhere.
Overall, interfirm racial segregation is a systemic issue that perpetuates racial inequality and limits diversity and inclusion within the workplace. It is important for companies to actively work towards creating equitable and inclusive environments that promote diversity and equal opportunities for all employees, regardless of their race or ethnicity.
See also
Related segregation forms
Interfirm racial segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
employment segregation 780x780px For the complete network of associated segregation forms, see: clusters https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 year of publication https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw betweenness centrality https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r disciplines where segregation forms first appeared https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Interfirm racial segregation appears in the following literature
Carrington W.J., Troske K.R. (1998). Interfirm segregation and the black/white wage gap. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(2), 231-260. University of Chicago Press.https://doi.org/10.1086/209888
Mouw T. (2002). Are black workers missing the connection? the effect of spatial distance and employee referrals on interfirm racial segregation. Demography, 39(3), 507-528. Duke University Press.https://doi.org/10.2307/3088329