Institutional gender segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
Weber A.S. (2009) | Weber A.S. (2009) e learning in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCC): Problems and prospects. ''Proceedings of the 8th IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education, WBE 2009'', 95-100. [https://doi.org/] | ||
Leetaru K. (2010) | Leetaru K. (2010) A new look at the institutional impact on women in postsecondary engineering education 1966 2007. ''Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering'', ''16''(2), 177-192. [https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v16.i2.60] |
Revision as of 07:51, 16 April 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
2009
Qatar
Definition
Institutional gender segregation refers to the practice of separating individuals based on their gender in various settings, such as schools, workplaces, or social spaces. This segregation can be enforced through policies, rules, or cultural norms that dictate different treatment or opportunities based on an individual's gender.
Examples of institutional gender segregation include:
- Single-gender schools or classrooms: Some educational institutions separate students based on their gender, believing that this approach can improve academic performance or social dynamics.
- Gender-specific job roles: Certain industries or workplaces may limit job opportunities based on gender, such as only hiring men for leadership positions or only women for administrative roles.
- Gender-specific dress codes: Some institutions enforce gender-specific dress codes that dictate what men and women are allowed to wear, reinforcing traditional gender norms and roles.
- Separate facilities for men and women: Public spaces like restrooms, changing rooms, or sports facilities may be segregated based on gender, which can create challenges for individuals who do not fit into a binary understanding of gender.
While institutional gender segregation may be intended to address perceived differences between men and women or maintain social order, it can also perpetuate stereotypes, limit opportunities for certain individuals, and contribute to inequality and discrimination. Efforts to promote gender equality and inclusivity often aim to challenge and dismantle institutional gender segregation.
See also
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Further reading
Weber A.S. (2009) e learning in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCC): Problems and prospects. Proceedings of the 8th IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education, WBE 2009, 95-100. [1]
Leetaru K. (2010) A new look at the institutional impact on women in postsecondary engineering education 1966 2007. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(2), 177-192. [2]