Interfirm racial segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | ====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | ||
1998<br> | 1998<br> | ||
United | United States | ||
====== Definition ====== | ====== Definition ====== | ||
{{NoteAI}} | {{NoteAI}} |
Revision as of 17:55, 8 April 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
1998
United States
Definition
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Interfirm racial segregation refers to the practice of racial segregation between different firms or companies. This means that companies may intentionally segregate their workforce based on race, leading to different racial groups being assigned to different firms or divisions within the same company.
This form of segregation can occur in several ways:
1. Recruitment and hiring: Companies may have biased hiring practices that favor one racial group over another. This can result in certain firms having a predominantly white workforce, while others have a predominantly non-white workforce.
2. Promotion and advancement: Discrimination in promotion and advancement opportunities can contribute to racial segregation between firms. If certain racial groups consistently face barriers to advancement within a company, they may be overrepresented in lower-level positions at certain firms.
3. Segregated workspaces: Some companies may physically separate employees based on race, either through assigning different racial groups to different departments or segregating them within the same workplace. This can lead to limited interaction and communication between different racial groups.
4. Discriminatory policies and practices: Companies may have policies or practices that disproportionately affect certain racial groups, leading to racial segregation between firms. For example, if a company implements a dress code policy that disproportionately affects employees of certain racial backgrounds, those employees may be more likely to seek employment elsewhere.
Overall, interfirm racial segregation is a systemic issue that perpetuates racial inequality and limits diversity and inclusion within the workplace. It is important for companies to actively work towards creating equitable and inclusive environments that promote diversity and equal opportunities for all employees, regardless of their race or ethnicity.
See also
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
Further reading
Carrington W.J.; Troske K.R. (1998) "Interfirm segregation and the black/white wage gap", Journal of Labor Economics, 16(2), pp. 231-260. University of Chicago Press. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1086/209888 10.1086/209888]
Mouw T. (2002) "Are black workers missing the connection? the effect of spatial distance and employee referrals on interfirm racial segregation", Demography, 39(3), pp. 507-528. Duke University Press. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.2307/3088329 10.2307/3088329]