De jure racial segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | ====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>====== | ||
2005<br> | 2005<br> | ||
United | United States | ||
====== Definition ====== | ====== Definition ====== | ||
{{NoteAI}} | {{NoteAI}} | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 8 April 2024
Date and country of first publication[1]
2005
United States
Definition
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
De jure racial segregation refers to the legally enforced separation of different racial or ethnic groups in society. This type of segregation is codified in laws and regulations that explicitly dictate where people of different races can live, work, attend school, and socialize. De jure racial segregation was prevalent in the United States prior to the Civil Rights Movement, with laws such as Jim Crow laws mandating separate facilities for white and black people. This system of segregation was eventually declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in landmark cases such as Brown v. Board of Education.
See also
References
Notes
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
Further reading
Boxill B.R. (2005) "Black liberation Yes!", The Liberation Debate: Rights at Issue, 49-63. Taylor and Francis. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.4324/9780203976692-13 10.4324/9780203976692-13]
Dubey M.; Goldberg E.S. (2011) "New frontiers, cross currents and convergences: Emerging cultural paradigms", The Cambridge History of African American Literature, 566-618. Cambridge University Press. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780511780967.025 10.1017/CHOL9780511780967.025]
Höhn M. (2011) "Love across the color line the limits of German and American Democracy, 1945 1968", Germans and African Americans: Two Centuries of Exchange, 105-125. University Press of Mississippi. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ]
Dixson A.D. (2011) "Democracy now? Race, education, and black self determination", Teachers College Record, 113(4), pp. 811-830. Teachers College, Columbia University. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ]
Kennedy R.L. (2014) "Ackerman's brown", Yale Law Journal, 123(8), pp. 3064-3075. Yale Law Journal. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/ ]
Clanton G. (2019) "A white memoir of the american apartheid: Lest we forget", Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 50(), pp. 171-180. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.. DOI: [htttp://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-239620190000050008 10.1108/S0163-239620190000050008]