Symbolic segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== | |||
1986<br> | 1986<br> | ||
United States | |||
===== Definition ===== | |||
Symbolic segregation refers to the practices or conditions that enforce social, cultural, or racial separation without explicitly stating or enforcing it through legal means. It involves the use of symbols, gestures, or subtle forms of discrimination to maintain divisions and exclude certain groups from full participation in society. | Symbolic segregation refers to the practices or conditions that enforce social, cultural, or racial separation without explicitly stating or enforcing it through legal means. It involves the use of symbols, gestures, or subtle forms of discrimination to maintain divisions and exclude certain groups from full participation in society. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | |||
{{NoteAI}} | |||
==Symbolic segregation appears in the following literature== | |||
Epstein C.F. (1986). Symbolic segregation: Similarities and differences in the language and non verbal communication of women and men. ''Sociological Forum'', ''1''(1), 27-49. Kluwer Academic Publishers.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115072 | |||
Picker G. (2011) | Picker G. (2011). Welcome in. left wing Tuscany and Romani migrants (1987 2007). ''Journal of Modern Italian Studies'', ''16''(5), 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2011.622469 | ||
Gacon S. (2017). From wall to wall. Dijon and its walls in the 19th century; [D'un mur à l'autre Dijon et ses murs au xixe siècle]. ''Annales de Bourgogne'', ''89''(2), 69-86. Societe des Annales de Bourgogne.https://doi.org/ | |||
El-Solh C.F., Mabro J. (202). Introduction: Islam and Muslim women. ''Muslim Women's Choices: Religious Belief and Social Reality'', 1-32. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135166-1 | |||
Latest revision as of 16:17, 25 September 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
1986
United States
Definition[edit | edit source]
Symbolic segregation refers to the practices or conditions that enforce social, cultural, or racial separation without explicitly stating or enforcing it through legal means. It involves the use of symbols, gestures, or subtle forms of discrimination to maintain divisions and exclude certain groups from full participation in society.
Examples of symbolic segregation can include:
1. Segregated seating or areas: In some public spaces, there may be unspoken norms or expectations that encourage different racial or ethnic groups to occupy separate areas, such as in parks or public transportation.
2. Language barriers: When certain languages or dialects are stigmatized or not given equal recognition, it can create symbolic segregation by limiting access to resources and opportunities for those who speak those languages.
3. Racial profiling: Unfair targeting or suspicion based on race can symbolically segregate individuals and communities, making them feel alienated or excluded from the broader society.
4. Cultural stereotypes: Prejudiced assumptions and stereotypes can reinforce symbols and imagery that perpetuate social divisions and segregate different cultural groups.
5. Unequal representation in media: When certain groups are underrepresented or misrepresented in mainstream media, it can perpetuate stereotypes and symbols that segregate them from equal participation and opportunities.
Symbolic segregation can have significant impacts on individuals and communities, leading to feelings of alienation, reduced access to resources and opportunities, and perpetuating social inequalities.
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Symbolic segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Epstein C.F. (1986). Symbolic segregation: Similarities and differences in the language and non verbal communication of women and men. Sociological Forum, 1(1), 27-49. Kluwer Academic Publishers.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115072
Picker G. (2011). Welcome in. left wing Tuscany and Romani migrants (1987 2007). Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 16(5), 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2011.622469
Gacon S. (2017). From wall to wall. Dijon and its walls in the 19th century; [D'un mur à l'autre Dijon et ses murs au xixe siècle]. Annales de Bourgogne, 89(2), 69-86. Societe des Annales de Bourgogne.https://doi.org/
El-Solh C.F., Mabro J. (202). Introduction: Islam and Muslim women. Muslim Women's Choices: Religious Belief and Social Reality, 1-32. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135166-1