Confessional segregation: Difference between revisions

From Segregation Wiki
(Creating page)
(Creating page)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
====== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>======  
===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>=====  
2005<br>
2005<br>
Germany
Germany
====== Definition ======  
===== Definition =====  


Confessional segregation refers to the practice of separating individuals based on their religious beliefs or affiliations in places of worship or religious ceremonies. This segregation can occur in various ways, such as allocating separate areas for different religious groups to worship or maintaining separate seating arrangements for different confessional groups during religious services.
Confessional segregation refers to the practice of separating individuals based on their religious beliefs or affiliations in places of worship or religious ceremonies. This segregation can occur in various ways, such as allocating separate areas for different religious groups to worship or maintaining separate seating arrangements for different confessional groups during religious services.
Line 18: Line 18:
<references />  
<references />  
{{NoteAI}}  
{{NoteAI}}  
==Further reading==  
==Confessional segregation appears in the following literature==  


Glasze G. (2005) "The spread of private guarded neighbourhoods in Lebanon and the significance of a historically and geographically specific governmentality", Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, 123-137. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203336182 10.4324/9780203336182]
Glasze G. (2005). The spread of private guarded neighbourhoods in Lebanon and the significance of a historically and geographically specific governmentality. ''Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives'', 123-137. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203336182


Andringa E. (2006) "Penetrating the Dutch polysystem: The reception of Virginia Woolf, 1920 2000", Poetics Today, 27(3), pp. 501-568. . DOI: [https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2006-001 10.1215/03335372-2006-001]
Andringa E. (2006). Penetrating the Dutch polysystem: The reception of Virginia Woolf, 1920 2000. ''Poetics Today'', ''27''(3), 501-568. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2006-001


Guidi A. (2017) "Defining inter communality between documents, tradition and collective memory: Jewish and non Jewish capital and labor in early twentieth century Rhodes", Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea, 17(2), pp. 165-180. Routledge. DOI: [https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2017.1324266 10.1080/14683857.2017.1324266]
Guidi A. (2017). Defining inter communality between documents, tradition and collective memory: Jewish and non Jewish capital and labor in early twentieth century Rhodes. ''Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea'', ''17''(2), 165-180. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2017.1324266

Latest revision as of 16:15, 25 September 2024

Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]

2005
Germany

Definition[edit | edit source]

Confessional segregation refers to the practice of separating individuals based on their religious beliefs or affiliations in places of worship or religious ceremonies. This segregation can occur in various ways, such as allocating separate areas for different religious groups to worship or maintaining separate seating arrangements for different confessional groups during religious services.

Confessional segregation can occur in different religious contexts, such as within Christianity, where various denominations may have their own designated sections in a church or hold separate services altogether. Similarly, in Islam, there might be separate prayer areas for different sects or schools of thought.

The reasons for confessional segregation can vary. Some religious groups may choose to segregate themselves to preserve their distinct beliefs and practices or to maintain a sense of religious community. Others may segregate based on historical or doctrinal disagreements within a broader religious tradition.

Critics argue that confessional segregation can foster division and hinder interfaith dialogue and understanding. It can reinforce religious identities and create barriers between different religious groups that may already have differences in belief or practice. However, proponents argue that confessional segregation allows for the preservation of unique religious traditions and creates spaces where individuals can worship and practice their faith without interaction or interference from other groups.

In contemporary societies, there is a growing emphasis on promoting inclusive and multicultural approaches to religious practice, aiming to create environments where individuals from different confessions can come together and foster interfaith relationships. This often involves promoting shared spaces for worship or encouraging collaborative efforts between different religious groups.

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.

Confessional segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]

Glasze G. (2005). The spread of private guarded neighbourhoods in Lebanon and the significance of a historically and geographically specific governmentality. Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, 123-137. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203336182

Andringa E. (2006). Penetrating the Dutch polysystem: The reception of Virginia Woolf, 1920 2000. Poetics Today, 27(3), 501-568. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2006-001

Guidi A. (2017). Defining inter communality between documents, tradition and collective memory: Jewish and non Jewish capital and labor in early twentieth century Rhodes. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea, 17(2), 165-180. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2017.1324266