Entrepreneurial segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Addressing entrepreneurial segregation requires efforts to promote inclusivity and diversity in entrepreneurship. This includes supporting initiatives that provide equitable access to funding, mentorship, and networks for underrepresented groups. It also involves creating policies that foster entrepreneurship in marginalized communities and reducing barriers to entry for aspiring entrepreneurs. By leveling the playing field, the entrepreneurial ecosystem can become more inclusive and equitable, allowing for the full potential of all entrepreneurs to be realized. | Addressing entrepreneurial segregation requires efforts to promote inclusivity and diversity in entrepreneurship. This includes supporting initiatives that provide equitable access to funding, mentorship, and networks for underrepresented groups. It also involves creating policies that foster entrepreneurship in marginalized communities and reducing barriers to entry for aspiring entrepreneurs. By leveling the playing field, the entrepreneurial ecosystem can become more inclusive and equitable, allowing for the full potential of all entrepreneurs to be realized. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==Related segregation forms== | |||
Entrepreneurial segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: | |||
[[horizontal segregation]] | |||
[[File:entrepreneurial_segregation.png|780x780px]] | |||
This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. | |||
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
{{NoteAI}} | {{NoteAI}} | ||
==Entrepreneurial | ==Entrepreneurial segregation appears in the following literature== | ||
Sappleton N. (2009). Women non traditional entrepreneurs and social capital. ''International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship'', ''1''(3), 192-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566260910990892 | Sappleton N. (2009). Women non traditional entrepreneurs and social capital. ''International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship'', ''1''(3), 192-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566260910990892 |
Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
2009
United Kingdom
Definition[edit | edit source]
Entrepreneurial segregation refers to the unequal distribution of entrepreneurial opportunities and resources based on factors such as race, gender, socio-economic status, and geographical location. It is a concept that describes how certain groups face systemic barriers and discrimination that limit their access to funding, networks, mentorship, and other resources needed to start and grow businesses.
Entrepreneurial segregation can manifest in various ways. For example, women and minority entrepreneurs often face challenges in securing funding due to biases and lack of representation in venture capital and angel investment networks. This leads to a lack of diversity in the entrepreneurial ecosystem, as certain groups are disproportionately excluded from opportunities to innovate and create wealth.
Geographical location can also contribute to entrepreneurial segregation. Startups and entrepreneurial activities tend to be concentrated in urban areas with robust ecosystems, leaving rural and disadvantaged communities with limited access to resources and support. This further exacerbates existing inequalities and limits economic development in these areas.
Addressing entrepreneurial segregation requires efforts to promote inclusivity and diversity in entrepreneurship. This includes supporting initiatives that provide equitable access to funding, mentorship, and networks for underrepresented groups. It also involves creating policies that foster entrepreneurship in marginalized communities and reducing barriers to entry for aspiring entrepreneurs. By leveling the playing field, the entrepreneurial ecosystem can become more inclusive and equitable, allowing for the full potential of all entrepreneurs to be realized.
See also[edit | edit source]
Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]
Entrepreneurial segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Entrepreneurial segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Sappleton N. (2009). Women non traditional entrepreneurs and social capital. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 192-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566260910990892
Sappleton N. (2018). Gender and business performance: the role of entrepreneurial segregation. Women Entrepreneurs and the Myth of 'Underperformance': A New Look at Women's Entrepreneurship Research, 213-229. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd..https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434500.00025
Sappleton N. (2018). Gender Congruity, Childlessness and Success in Entrepreneurship: An Intersectional Bourdieusian Analysis. Voluntary and Involuntary Childlessness: The Joys of Otherhood?, 283-305. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd..https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-361-420181013