Technological segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== | |||
1997<br> | 1997<br> | ||
United States | United States | ||
===== Definition ===== | |||
Technological segregation refers to the unequal access and use of technology based on factors such as income, education level, race, or location. This can result in certain groups or communities being excluded from the benefits of technology, leading to further inequality and social disparities. Some examples of technological segregation include limited internet access in rural or low-income areas, disparities in digital literacy skills, and lack of diversity in the tech industry. Efforts to address technological segregation may include promoting digital inclusivity, providing access to technology resources, and advocating for policies that bridge the digital divide. | Technological segregation refers to the unequal access and use of technology based on factors such as income, education level, race, or location. This can result in certain groups or communities being excluded from the benefits of technology, leading to further inequality and social disparities. Some examples of technological segregation include limited internet access in rural or low-income areas, disparities in digital literacy skills, and lack of diversity in the tech industry. Efforts to address technological segregation may include promoting digital inclusivity, providing access to technology resources, and advocating for policies that bridge the digital divide. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
== | {{NoteAI}} | ||
==Technological segregation appears in the following literature== | |||
Welter C.H. (1997) | Welter C.H. (1997). Technological segregation: A peek through the looking glass at the rich and poor in an information age. ''Arts Education Policy Review'', ''99''(2), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632919709600764 | ||
Latest revision as of 16:17, 25 September 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
1997
United States
Definition[edit | edit source]
Technological segregation refers to the unequal access and use of technology based on factors such as income, education level, race, or location. This can result in certain groups or communities being excluded from the benefits of technology, leading to further inequality and social disparities. Some examples of technological segregation include limited internet access in rural or low-income areas, disparities in digital literacy skills, and lack of diversity in the tech industry. Efforts to address technological segregation may include promoting digital inclusivity, providing access to technology resources, and advocating for policies that bridge the digital divide.
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Technological segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Welter C.H. (1997). Technological segregation: A peek through the looking glass at the rich and poor in an information age. Arts Education Policy Review, 99(2), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632919709600764