Romantic segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
{{NoteAI}} | {{NoteAI}} | ||
==Romantic | ==Romantic segregation appears in the following literature== | ||
Robinson R.K. (2009). Racing the closet. ''Stanford Law Review'', ''61''(6), 1463-1533. https://doi.org/ | Robinson R.K. (2009). Racing the closet. ''Stanford Law Review'', ''61''(6), 1463-1533. https://doi.org/ | ||
Latest revision as of 16:17, 25 September 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
2009
United States
Definition[edit | edit source]
Romantic segregation refers to the practice or policy of separating individuals or groups based on their romantic or sexual preferences. It can occur in various contexts, such as race, religion, or social class. This term is not commonly used and may have negative connotations, as it implies the discriminatory separation of people based on their romantic preferences.
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Romantic segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Robinson R.K. (2009). Racing the closet. Stanford Law Review, 61(6), 1463-1533. https://doi.org/