Carceral segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== | |||
2019<br> | 2019<br> | ||
Canada | |||
===== Definition ===== | |||
Carceral segregation refers to the practice of separating incarcerated individuals based on certain demographic characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or gender. This is often done within correctional facilities and prison systems for various reasons, including maintaining safety and security, addressing specific needs or vulnerabilities, or managing conflicts between different groups. | Carceral segregation refers to the practice of separating incarcerated individuals based on certain demographic characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or gender. This is often done within correctional facilities and prison systems for various reasons, including maintaining safety and security, addressing specific needs or vulnerabilities, or managing conflicts between different groups. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
== | {{NoteAI}} | ||
==Carceral segregation appears in the following literature== | |||
Kilty J.M. | Kilty J.M., Lehalle S. (2019). Mad, bad, and stuck in the hole: Carceral segregation as slow violence. ''Madness, Violence, and Power: A Critical Collection'', 310-329. University of Toronto Press.https://doi.org/ | ||
Latest revision as of 16:15, 25 September 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
2019
Canada
Definition[edit | edit source]
Carceral segregation refers to the practice of separating incarcerated individuals based on certain demographic characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or gender. This is often done within correctional facilities and prison systems for various reasons, including maintaining safety and security, addressing specific needs or vulnerabilities, or managing conflicts between different groups.
However, carceral segregation has been widely criticized for perpetuating inequalities, discrimination, and reinforcing systemic racism within the criminal justice system. Critics argue that it can lead to the overrepresentation of certain groups, particularly racial and ethnic minorities, in certain parts of the prison system and exacerbate the social, economic, and psychological challenges they face.
Additionally, carceral segregation can hinder access to educational and rehabilitative programs, limit the opportunity for social interaction and reintegration, and contribute to the dehumanization and stigmatization of incarcerated individuals. Some advocates for prison reform argue for alternatives to carceral segregation, such as implementing restorative justice practices that prioritize rehabilitation, community reintegration, and addressing the root causes of criminal behavior.
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Carceral segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Kilty J.M., Lehalle S. (2019). Mad, bad, and stuck in the hole: Carceral segregation as slow violence. Madness, Violence, and Power: A Critical Collection, 310-329. University of Toronto Press.https://doi.org/