Scholarly segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Overall, while scholarly segregation can have its benefits, it is crucial to actively foster collaboration, integration, and inclusivity in academia to promote a more comprehensive understanding of the world. | Overall, while scholarly segregation can have its benefits, it is crucial to actively foster collaboration, integration, and inclusivity in academia to promote a more comprehensive understanding of the world. | ||
==== | ==See also== | ||
==Related segregation forms== | |||
Scholarly segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: | |||
[[social segregation]] | |||
[[File:scholarly_segregation.png|780x780px]] | |||
This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. | |||
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
{{NoteAI}} | {{NoteAI}} | ||
==Scholarly | ==Scholarly segregation appears in the following literature== | ||
Schwartz M. (2017 | Schwartz M. (2017). Academic apartheid and the poverty of theory: the impact of scholarly segregation on the development of sociology in the United States. ''British Journal of Sociology'', ''68''(1), 49-66. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12242_2 | ||
Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
2017
United States
Definition[edit | edit source]
Scholarly segregation refers to the practice of separating and categorizing academic knowledge based on various criteria such as discipline, methodology, or subject area. It is the process by which academic knowledge is segmented into distinct fields, subfields, and specialized disciplines.
Scholarly segregation can have both positive and negative effects. On the positive side, it allows for focused study and specialization in specific areas, leading to deeper understanding and advancements in knowledge within those fields. It also enables scholars to collaborate and communicate more effectively within their respective disciplines.
On the negative side, scholarly segregation can create barriers between different disciplines, hindering interdisciplinary collaboration and cross-pollination of ideas. This can limit the opportunities for innovation and holistic understanding of complex phenomena that require multiple perspectives.
Moreover, scholarly segregation can perpetuate a hierarchal structure within academia, where certain fields or disciplines are considered more prestigious or valuable than others. This can result in unequal distribution of resources, funding, and recognition, further marginalizing less established or interdisciplinary fields.
Efforts to address scholarly segregation include promoting interdisciplinary research, encouraging collaboration across disciplines, and recognizing the value of broader knowledge integration. There is also a growing recognition of the need for interdisciplinary approaches to tackle complex societal challenges that cannot be solved within the confines of a single discipline.
Overall, while scholarly segregation can have its benefits, it is crucial to actively foster collaboration, integration, and inclusivity in academia to promote a more comprehensive understanding of the world.
See also[edit | edit source]
Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]
Scholarly segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Scholarly segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Schwartz M. (2017). Academic apartheid and the poverty of theory: the impact of scholarly segregation on the development of sociology in the United States. British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 49-66. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12242_2