Religious gender segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== | |||
2016<br> | 2016<br> | ||
United States | United States | ||
===== Definition ===== | |||
Religious gender segregation refers to the practice of separating individuals of different genders in religious settings or activities. This practice is seen in various religious traditions and can be observed in different ways, such as separate seating areas for men and women in places of worship, separate prayer times, or separate educational opportunities. | Religious gender segregation refers to the practice of separating individuals of different genders in religious settings or activities. This practice is seen in various religious traditions and can be observed in different ways, such as separate seating areas for men and women in places of worship, separate prayer times, or separate educational opportunities. | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
It is important to note that religious gender segregation is not universally practiced across all religions, and practices can vary greatly depending on the specific interpretation and beliefs within a particular religious community. | It is important to note that religious gender segregation is not universally practiced across all religions, and practices can vary greatly depending on the specific interpretation and beliefs within a particular religious community. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==Related segregation forms== | |||
Religious gender segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: | |||
[[gender segregation]] | |||
[[File:religious_gender_segregation.png|780x780px]] | |||
This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. | |||
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
{{NoteAI}} | {{NoteAI}} | ||
== | ==Religious gender segregation appears in the following literature== | ||
Tamir H. | Tamir H., Stephens D.P., Levitt M.J. (2016). Cross sex versus same sex experience and relationship satisfaction: addressing diverse social networks among Orthodox Jews. ''Mental Health, Religion and Culture'', ''19''(6), 587-599. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2016.1217516 |
Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
2016
United States
Definition[edit | edit source]
Religious gender segregation refers to the practice of separating individuals of different genders in religious settings or activities. This practice is seen in various religious traditions and can be observed in different ways, such as separate seating areas for men and women in places of worship, separate prayer times, or separate educational opportunities.
The reasons for religious gender segregation can vary depending on the interpretation of religious texts, cultural traditions, or social beliefs. Some argue that it promotes modesty, preserves purity, or enhances spirituality. Others view it as a way to maintain social order or preserve traditional gender roles.
While religious gender segregation can be voluntary and willingly practiced by individuals who consider it an important aspect of their faith, it can also be imposed by religious institutions or societies on their members. This can raise concerns about gender equality and the promotion of discrimination or inequality based on gender.
The practice of religious gender segregation is subject to significant criticism and debate. Critics argue that it reinforces gender stereotypes, limits opportunities for women, and perpetuates inequality. Others argue that it violates principles of gender equality and individual rights.
It is important to note that religious gender segregation is not universally practiced across all religions, and practices can vary greatly depending on the specific interpretation and beliefs within a particular religious community.
See also[edit | edit source]
Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]
Religious gender segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Religious gender segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Tamir H., Stephens D.P., Levitt M.J. (2016). Cross sex versus same sex experience and relationship satisfaction: addressing diverse social networks among Orthodox Jews. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 19(6), 587-599. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2016.1217516