Legally accepted segregation: Difference between revisions
(Creating page) |
(Creating page) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== | |||
2008<br> | 2008<br> | ||
United Kingdom | |||
===== Definition ===== | |||
Legally accepted segregation refers to the practice of segregation that is sanctioned or permitted by law or upheld by legal authorities. This type of segregation occurs when laws, regulations, or policies explicitly allow for the separation or differential treatment of individuals or groups based on certain characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, or socioeconomic status. | |||
Historically, legally accepted segregation has been prevalent in many societies, particularly during periods of institutionalized discrimination such as apartheid in South Africa or the Jim Crow laws in the United States. These laws legalized and enforced the separation of individuals based on race, often resulting in segregated schools, neighborhoods, public facilities, and other aspects of daily life. | |||
Even though many explicit forms of legally accepted segregation have been abolished or overturned, its legacy continues to affect societies in various ways. For example, disparities in education, employment, housing, and access to resources may persist as a result of past segregationist policies and practices. | |||
Efforts to combat legally accepted segregation often involve legal challenges, policy changes, and advocacy for equal rights and opportunities for all individuals regardless of their race, ethnicity, or other characteristics. These efforts aim to dismantle systemic barriers and promote inclusivity, diversity, and equity in society. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
==Related segregation forms== | |||
Legally accepted segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: | |||
[[racial segregation]] | |||
[[File:legally_accepted_segregation.png|780x780px]] | |||
This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. | |||
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] | |||
* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | |||
{{NoteAI}} | |||
==Legally accepted segregation appears in the following literature== | |||
Beratan G.D. (2008) | Beratan G.D. (2008). The song remains the same: Transposition and the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. ''Race Ethnicity and Education'', ''11''(4), 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320802478820 | ||
Latest revision as of 07:17, 16 October 2024
Date and country of first publication[1][edit | edit source]
2008
United Kingdom
Definition[edit | edit source]
Legally accepted segregation refers to the practice of segregation that is sanctioned or permitted by law or upheld by legal authorities. This type of segregation occurs when laws, regulations, or policies explicitly allow for the separation or differential treatment of individuals or groups based on certain characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, or socioeconomic status.
Historically, legally accepted segregation has been prevalent in many societies, particularly during periods of institutionalized discrimination such as apartheid in South Africa or the Jim Crow laws in the United States. These laws legalized and enforced the separation of individuals based on race, often resulting in segregated schools, neighborhoods, public facilities, and other aspects of daily life.
Even though many explicit forms of legally accepted segregation have been abolished or overturned, its legacy continues to affect societies in various ways. For example, disparities in education, employment, housing, and access to resources may persist as a result of past segregationist policies and practices.
Efforts to combat legally accepted segregation often involve legal challenges, policy changes, and advocacy for equal rights and opportunities for all individuals regardless of their race, ethnicity, or other characteristics. These efforts aim to dismantle systemic barriers and promote inclusivity, diversity, and equity in society.
See also[edit | edit source]
Related segregation forms[edit | edit source]
Legally accepted segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms:
This visualization is based on the study The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research.
For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to:
References[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).
At its current state, this definition has been generated by a Large Language Model (LLM) so far without review by an independent researcher or a member of the curating team of segregation experts that keep the Segregation Wiki online. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its reliability, completeness and timeliness. Please use this content with caution and verify information as needed. Also, feel free to improve on the definition as you see fit, including the use of references and other informational resources. We value your input in enhancing the quality and accuracy of the definitions of segregation forms collectively offered in the Segregation Wiki ©.
Legally accepted segregation appears in the following literature[edit | edit source]
Beratan G.D. (2008). The song remains the same: Transposition and the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 11(4), 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320802478820