10 Unexpected Pragmatic Ranking Tips: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

2 January 2025

  • curprev 02:1702:17, 2 January 2025‎ HildegardHorsley talk contribs‎ 9,456 bytes +9,456‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>To advance implementation research and practice, it is important to have measures that are both pragmatic and psychometrically valid. This study was designed to establish practical measurement criteria by using a collaborative stakeholder-based process. A systematic review of literature and semi-structured stakeholder meetings provided 47 criteria for rating.<br><br>Based on data from Scopus WOS and Lens, a ranking of the top authors of pragmatic..."
Retrieved from "https://segregationwiki.cityscience.group/index.php/10_Unexpected_Pragmatic_Ranking_Tips"