Editing Schelling segregation

===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== 
1991<br>
United States
===== Definition ===== 

Schelling segregation refers to a theory developed by economist Thomas C. Schelling in the 1960s, which explains how even a preference for a small degree of segregation can lead to the formation of highly segregated communities. Schelling's model used a simple mathematical framework to illustrate this phenomenon.

According to Schelling, individuals have a threshold, or a certain level of tolerance, for the proportion of their neighbors that belong to a different social group or community. If the actual proportion exceeds an individual's threshold, they might find it uncomfortable and choose to move to a more homogeneous neighborhood.

In Schelling's model, agents are placed on a grid, where each agent is assigned a fixed threshold. Initially, the agents are scattered randomly. In each time step, an agent may decide to move to a vacant location if the proportion of their neighbors from a different group exceeds their threshold. This process of movement continues until no agent wishes to relocate.

The surprising outcome of Schelling's model is that even slight preferences for homogeneity can lead to the emergence of highly segregated residential patterns. Schelling showed that a relatively mixed distribution of agents in the beginning can quickly evolve into segregated clusters, with each group occupying separate areas.

Schelling's work highlights how individual preferences for similarity can perpetuate and reinforce segregation, even in the absence of explicit discrimination or animosity towards different groups. This theory has been applied to understand residential segregation, racial and ethnic segregation, and other social phenomena.
===== Synonyms ===== 
The following terms are synonymous with schelling segregation:

schelling residential segregation; schelling's neighborhood segregation; schelling's segregation.

References and literature addressing this segregation form under these synonymous terms can be found below.
==See also== 
==Related segregation forms==
Schelling segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: 

[[neighborhood racial segregation]], [[social segregation]], [[residential segregation]]
[[File:schelling_segregation.png|780x780px]]

This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. 

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: 

* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] 
==References== 
==Notes== 
<references /> 
{{NoteAI}} 
==Schelling segregation appears in the following literature== 

Clark W.A.V. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the schelling segregation model. ''Demography'', ''28''(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061333

Theobald D.M., Gross M.D. (1994). EML: A modeling environment for exploring landscape dynamics. ''Computers, Environment and Urban Systems'', ''18''(3), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-9715(94)90024-8

Lieberson S., Dumais S., Baumann S. (2). The instability of androgynous names: The symbolic maintenance of gender boundaries. ''American Journal of Sociology'', ''10''(5), 1249-1287. University of Chicago Press.https://doi.org/10.1086/210431

Laurie A.J., Jaggi N.K. (2003). Role of 'vision' in neighbourhood racial segregation: A variant of the schelling segregation model. ''Urban Studies'', ''40''(13), 2687-2704. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000146849

Ruoff G., Schneider G. (2006). Segregation in the classroom: An empirical test of the schelling model. ''Rationality and Society'', ''18''(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463106060154

Marks R.E. (2007). Validating simulation models: A general framework and four applied examples. ''Computational Economics'', ''30''(3), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-007-9101-7

Crooks A., Hudson-Smith A., Dearden J. (2009). Agent street: An environment for exploring agent based models in Second Life. ''JASSS'', ''12''(4), -. https://doi.org/

Singh A., Vainchtein D., Weiss H. (2009). Schelling's segregation model: Parameters, scaling, and aggregation. ''Demographic Research'', ''21''(), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.12

Grauwin S., Goffette-Nagot F., Jensen P. (2012). Dynamic models of residential segregation: An analytical solution. ''Journal of Public Economics'', ''96''(1-2), 124-141. Elsevier B.V..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.08.011

Bersini H. (2012). UML for ABM. ''JASSS'', ''15''(1), -. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.1897

Baldwin W.C., Boardman J.T., Sauser B.J. (2013). Expanding a System of Systems Model with the Schelling Segregation Model. ''Systems Research and Behavioral Science'', ''30''(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2115

Barde S. (2015). Back to the Future: Economic Self Organisation and Maximum Entropy Prediction. ''Computational Economics'', ''45''(2), 337-358. Kluwer Academic Publishers.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-014-9422-2

Chie B.-T., Chen S.-H. (2015). The use of knowledge in prediction markets: How much of them need he know?. ''Journal of Information Science and Engineering'', ''31''(1), 1-22. Institute of Information Science.https://doi.org/

Urrutia-Mosquera J., López-Ospina H., Sabatini F., Rasse A. (2017). Tolerance to diversity and residential segregation. An adaptation of the Schelling segregation model with three social groups; [Tolerancia a la diversidad y segregación residencial. Una adaptación del modelo de segregación de Schelling con tres grupos sociales]. ''Eure'', ''43''(130), 5-24. Revista de Geografia Norte Grande.https://doi.org/10.4067/s0250-71612017000300005

Troitzsch K.G. (2017). Axiomatic theory and simulation: A philosophy of science perspective on schelling’s segregation model. ''JASSS'', ''20''(1), -. University of Surrey.https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3372

Gretha O.B., Cristal P.M., Mauhe N. (2018). Segregation in social networks: A simple schelling like model. ''Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2018'', 95-98. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc..https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508751

Tarko V., Gangotena S.J. (2019). FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS: THE CALCULUS OF CONSENT AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. ''Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology'', ''37B''(), 197-221. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd..https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-41542019000037B021