Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Segregation Forms
Random Page
Add or Edit Entries
Recent changes
An Ontology of Segregation
About Segregation Wiki
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Instructional segregation
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Definition ===== Instructional segregation refers to the practice of separating students based on their academic abilities or achievements, and providing them with different instructional experiences or opportunities. This segregation can occur within a classroom or school, or through tracking or ability grouping. There are several forms of instructional segregation, including: 1. Ability grouping: Students are grouped into different tracks or classes based on their perceived academic abilities or achievement levels. For example, students may be placed in high, middle, or low-level classes for various subjects. 2. Tracking: Students are placed in specific tracks or programs based on their academic performance, typically for the entirety of their school career. This often leads to separate curricula and instructional approaches for each track. 3. Achievement-based segregation: Students are assigned to specific instructional programs or interventions based on their performance on standardized tests or other assessments. This can result in separate interventions or remedial programs for struggling students. 4. Special education programs: Students with disabilities are often placed in separate classrooms or schools to receive specialized instruction tailored to their individual needs. Critics argue that instructional segregation can have negative consequences for students. For instance: 1. Social and psychological impact: Being labeled as low-achieving or placed in a lower track can have detrimental effects on students' self-esteem and self-confidence. It may lead to stigmatization and further exacerbate educational inequalities. 2. Limited opportunities: Students in lower tracks may be provided with a less rigorous curriculum, fewer resources, or less experienced teachers, which can limit their educational opportunities and future prospects. 3. Lack of diversity: Segregation can lead to racially or socioeconomically homogenous classrooms or schools, minimizing opportunities for students to engage with peers from different backgrounds and limiting their exposure to diverse perspectives. 4. Reinforcing inequalities: Instructional segregation can perpetuate existing achievement gaps among students, as students in higher tracks receive additional resources and support, while those in lower tracks struggle to catch up. To address instructional segregation, schools and educators can: 1. Implement inclusive practices: Emphasize differentiated instruction within mixed-ability classrooms, allowing all students to experience challenging and supportive instruction tailored to their needs. 2. Provide equitable resources: Ensure that all classrooms have access to high-quality instructional materials, technology, and well-trained teachers, regardless of the students' tracking or ability group. 3. Prioritize teacher professional development: Equip teachers with strategies to provide effective instruction to students with diverse learning needs, allowing them to cater to the various skill levels present within their classrooms. 4. Encourage collaboration and teamwork: Encourage collaboration among teachers of various tracks or abilities to share best practices, resources, and knowledge, fostering a sense of collective responsibility for all students' success. 5. Reevaluate tracking and ability grouping practices: Regularly reassess the effectiveness and equity of tracking or ability grouping policies, considering alternative approaches that promote inclusive education and minimize instructional segregation.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Segregation Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Segregation Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width